TMI Blog2003 (12) TMI 629X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h the respondent was acquitted of the charges under Section 20 (b) (i) of the Narcotic Drugs Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 (for short 'the Act'). Though the trial court found the respondent-accused guilty of offences, the High Court held that the accusation was not established and, therefore, directed acquittal. The factual position is as under : On 13.5.1994 at about 7.00 A.M. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing home the accusations, the prosecution examined three witnesses; PW-1, the Excise Sub-Inspector, Mobile Squad No. 1, Cuttack, P.W. 2 was a witness to the seizure and P.W.3 the ASI who accompanied PW-1 on patrol duty. PW-2 pleaded ignorance about the contents of the seizure memo though he admitted his signature. Considering the evidence on record, the trial court held the accused guilty and s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to be kept in the Excise Malkhana. That being so, the High Court held that the prosecution version was not acceptable. Reliance was placed in Valasla v. State of Kerala, AIR (1994) SC 117 to support the conclusion. Accordingly the High Court directed acquittal of the accused. In support of the appeal, Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, learned counsel submitted that the decision in Valasla's case (supr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re they were brought and sent for chemical examination. This relevant aspect, appears to have been missed by the High Court. In Valasla's case (supra) it was not laid down that whenever there is delay in sending the samples, the prosecution version would become vulnerable. What was emphasised related to proper and safe custody of the seized articles. In the background of that particular case, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
