2005 (3) TMI 9

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... any (P) Ltd., we take up the appeal itself for disposal. We heard Shri S.D. Sankaran, learned Consultant, and Shri A. Jayachandran, learned JDR. The appellants had taken the Modvat credit on capital goods amounting to Rs. 1,34,217/- and side by side also claimed depreciation in the Income-tax Return. The learned consultant submitted that out of Rs. 1,34,217/- they are only challenging the order in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... thority. He has also placed reliance on the decisions in the case of Shri Ghanshyam Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd v. CCE, Aurangabad reported in 2004 (178) E.L.T. 163 (T) and Terna Shetkari S.S.K. Ltd v. CCE, Aurangabad reported in 2003 (159) E.L.T. 777 (T) wherein the Modvat credit has been allowed once the appellants have demonstrated that depreciation for income-tax purpose was not claimed by them. Furth .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X