Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (9) TMI 1227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the AO on the basis of circle rate u/s. 50C but in whole disregard of explanation and evidences placed on the record by assessee. (ii) Because, on one side ld. CIT(A) failed to consider the specific instances placed by the assessee in support of Market rate being lower than circle rate and on the other hand failed to admit the valuation report in terms of rule 46A, hence order is arbitrary. (iii) Because, Ld. CIT(A) grossly erred in holding that, it is not mandatory for AO refer the matter (dispute about market value) to DVO in terms of section 50C(2) of the Act and the same could have been so referred only when assessee would have filed Valuer's report, hence, action of AO is not referring the matter to DVO is illegally upheld. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... plot was Rs. 35,68,000/-. The AO asked the assessee why section 50C of the I.T. Act should not be applied in the case of the plots sold by the assessee company in the year under consideration. In response to the same, the assessee filed reply dated 20.12.2010 and stated that the rate adopted by the AO is higher than the prevailing market rate in the area. As a proof of prevailing market rate, assessee has filed certified copies of some of the deeds executed by other parties. Assessee requested the AO that prevailing fair market value of the property sold on lower than the circle rate declared by the Registration Authority and therefore, the sale consideration so received has been adopted by the assessee for taxation purposes. The provision .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for valuation to the DVO and thereafter decide the issue in dispute Denovo and pass a speaking order. In support of his contention, he cited the following judgments.:- (a) Anil Kumar Jain vs. ITO (2013) 143 ITD 659 : 34 Taxmann.com 259 (Del) (b) Sarwan Kumar vs. ITO (2014) 150 ITD 289 : 45 Taxmann.com 16 (Del) (c) Appadural Vijayaraghwan vs. JCIT (2014) 369 ITR 486 taxmann.com (Madras) 7. On the contrary, Ld. DR relied upon the orders of the revenue authorities and stated that the Revenue Authorities have passed the well reasoned order, as per the provisions of the law, therefore, he strongly opposed the request of the assessee. 8. I have heard both the parties and perused the records available with me, especially the provisions .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e is made, the provisions of sub-sections(2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of section 16A clause (i) of sub-section (1) and sub-sections (6) and (7) of section 23A, Sub-section (5) of section 24, Section 34AA, section 35 and section 37 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (27 of 1957), shall with necessary modifications, apply in relation to such reference as they apply in relation to a reference made by the AO under sub-section (1) of section 16A of that Act." 8.2 Keeping in view of the aforesaid provisions of law, I am of the considered opinion that the assessee has dispute before the AO the value adopted by the Stamp Valuation Authority. In view of the aforesaid provisions of section 50C(2) of the I.T. Act as well as the following citations relied upo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ee did not produce the same during the course of assessment proceedings. In my opinion, this is contrary to the principles of natural justice and the provisions of Rule 46A of the I.T. Rules, 1962. The evidence filed by the assessee is very much relevant for the proper decision on the issue in dispute. Secondly, as per the provisions of section 50C(2) of the I.T. Act, as reproduced above, when the assessee made claim before the AO that the value adopted or assessed by the Stamp Valuation Authority was higher than the fair market value of the property and this is also not disputed by the assessee in appeal or should have been or otherwise to any other authority or court as referred to section 50C(2) of the I.T. Act. It is the duty of the AO .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates