Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shiv Kumar Versus ITO, Ward -20 (2) , New Delhi

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Held that:- Making additions and partly confirming them we find that both authorities have not passed speaking orders and moreover the necessary clarifications stated by assessee were not properly examined. Assessing Officer has also completed assessment u/s 144 of the Act. Therefore in view of the substantial justice we are of the view that appeals confirming the assessment and confirming the penalties needs to be looked after again by AO. The AO will provide sufficient .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essment completed by AO u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 whereas ITA No. 3902/Del/2014 relates to confirmation of penalty imposed by AO u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and ITA No. 3903/Del/2014 relates to confirmation of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. 2. These appeals were heard together. Therefore for the sake of convenience a common and consolidated order is being passed. None was present on behalf of assessee. However it was felt that the appeals can be disposed off .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arts whereas before Ld. CIT(A) he changed his stance and stated that he had earned income from tuition and in fact before Ld. CIT(A) he also stated that the return was filed by him by mistake and in fact he was not liable for income tax. Ld. DR submitted that how can be a person file a return and then deny that it was not his return. Therefore Ld. DR submitted that additions sustained by Ld. CIT(A) need to be confirmed. 4. We have heard Ld. DR and have gone through the material available on reco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the assessee. (Addition of ₹ 64,528/-) B. No capital has been shown as utilized. It is not possible to do the business without capital to make sale of ₹ 5,08,431/-. The assessee may require atleast ₹ 1,00,000/- (approx) as his capital. As the assessee did not show any capital, ₹ 1,00,000/ - is added to the income of the assessee as investment u/s 68 of the IT Act. (Addition of ₹ 1,00,000/-) C. As per column 51 of the ITR the assessee has shown net profit of ₹ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the nature of these expenses. In the absence of details, 1/4th of the above expenses which comes to ₹ 74,420/- is disallowed and added to the income of the assessee. (Addition of ₹ 74,420/- ) E. As per return, in column No. 6, the assessee has shown sundry creditors at ₹ 19,872/-. No details of the creditors has been provided. The onus lies on the assessee to prove the genuineness of the creditor which the assessee failed. In the absence of the details, ₹ 19,872/- outst .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of income, initially claiming in the Return that he was involved in trading of Auto Parts etc., subsequently claiming that he was having income from tuition and that he was running coaching Classes under the name and style of 'Oasis Acadmy' and then subsequently claimed that he had no income from tuition in the year under consideration. In view of these contradictory and false claims of the Appellant, it is clear that the claims of the Assessee are not reliable and it is apparent that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e has no evidence for his claims that he went away from Delhi in December, 2008 and returned back after two years in December 2010 and also that he did not receive any notices from the Assessing Officer. On one hand the assessee claims to be engaged in Automobile business, on the other hand claims that he is having tuition income and running Oasis Academy and then, to avoid the taxes and penalties claims that he was not having any income from tuition in AY 08- 09 and has even filed an affidavit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y clear that the conduct of the Assessee was deliberate, it can not be taken as a minor inadvertent mistake. 8.6 The Assessee has claimed that he did not get reasonable opportunity for making compliance before the Assessing Officer. However. it is seen that sufficient opportunity was given to him in Appeal but the Assessee did not avail of that opportunity and did not submit all the information, details, documents etc. and rather changed his claims regarding the income of the year under consider .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

were confirmed. 8.7 It is seen that the conduct of the Assessee was deliberate, and with an intention to prevent the truth from coming out, the Assessee kept on shifting his stand about his income for AY 08-09 and having initially claimed in the Return that he was involved in trading of Auto Parts etc., subsequently claimed that he was having income from tuition and that he was running coaching classes under the name and style or 'Oasis Acadmy' and then subsequently claimed that he had n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y the Assessing Officer U/S 68 of the IT Act. The Assessee has stated that the Appellant has already shown his actual investment in the Balance Sheet. The Assessing Officer has not been able to point out any investment by the Assessee over and above that shown in the Balance Sheet and hence, I am unable to sustain this addition which is hereby deleted. 8.9 The Assessing Officer has added a difference of ₹ 54,853/- to the income of the basis that the Assessee has disclosed net profit of  .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ert these observations. though it was claimed in the Written Submissions dated 30.05.13 that all the expenses are for business purpose only. It is noteworthy that the claim of genuineness of expenses is contrary to the subsequent claims of the Assessee. In view of the entire facts. the addition amounting to ₹ 74/420/- is hereby confirmed. 8.11 Sundry Creditors amount to ₹ 19,872/- were added back to the Income of the Assessee in the absence of any details and the Assessee being unabl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version