2013 (2) TMI 703

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... USTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Counsel for the petitioner stated that, in reply dated 20.11.2012, the petitioner requested to treat the same as a preliminary reply and reserve the right of petitioner to file further and final reply after cross-examination of as many as 28 persons, who were mentioned in reply and whose statements were relied upon by the department. It was requested that cross-examinatio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not be a vested right in the noticee and whether to grant cross-examination on the grounds, depend on the facts of a particular case. When such a request is made, at least the person has a right to have such a request considered. Under the circumstances, NOTICE returnable on 21.03.2013. The respondents shall not implement the impugned order. Direct service.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, O .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X