2015 (10) TMI 838

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt : Mr. Anil Nigam, Addl. Commissioner (AR) For the Respondent : Mr. C. Saravanan & S. Thenmozhi, Advocates ORDER: Per : ARCHANA WADHWA Being aggrieved with a part of the impugned order of the Commissioner, Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 2. It is seen that vide his impugned order Commissioner classified the newsprint in reels manufactured by the appellant as falling under 4823. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the Commissioner. 4. It stands brought to our notice that a part of the Commissioners order holding the classification under heading 4823.90 was also put to challenge by the respondent, before the Tribunal and vide its Final Order No.1069/2006 dated 18.5.2006, the classification of Newsprint in reel form was held to be falling under heading 4801.00 and the respondents appeal was allowed. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X