Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 1438 - ITAT CHENNAI

2015 (10) TMI 1438 - ITAT CHENNAI - TMI - Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - Held that:- It is not in dispute that the assessee-company is not a shareholder in M/s Trimex Industries Private Limited. Section 2(22)(e) of the Act clearly says that any payment made by a company by way of advance or loan to a shareholder or to the benefit of the shareholder, it has to be treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Act. Dividend has to be assessed only in the hands of the shareholders. If the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hands of common shareholders/Directors on whose benefit the advance was made. Since the assessee-company is not a shareholder in M/s Trimex Industries Private Limited, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act is not applicable. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No.2000/Mds/2013 - Dated:- 26-6-2015 - Shri N.R.S. Ganesan and Shri A. Mohan Alankamony, JJ. For the Petitioner : Sh. Joe Sebastian, CIT For the Respondent : Sh. B.S. Purushotham, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ointed out that the assessee-company has received 6,42,25,343/- from its sister concern M/s Trimex Industries Private Limited. According to the Ld. D.R., both, the assessee-company as well as its sister concern M/s Trimex Industries Private Limited, have common shareholders and Directors. Therefore, according to the Ld. D.R., the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act is squarely applicable. Referring to the assessment order, the Ld. D.R. pointed out that the assessee-company entered into agr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

requirement was established. Therefore, the receipt of advance of 6,42,25,343/- has to be considered as deemed dividend. Hence, the CIT(Appeals) is not justified in allowing the claim of the assessee. 3. On the contrary, Shri B.S. Purushotham, the Ld. representative for the assessee, submitted that the assessee company is not a shareholder in M/s Trimex Industries Private Limited. Therefore, according to the Ld. representative, there is no question of applying the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version