Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

C.C.E., Kanpur Versus New Decent Footwear Industries

2015 (10) TMI 2212 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

Denial of refund claim - Notification No.41/2007-ST dated 6.10.2007 - Held that:- Notification No.41/207-ST authorises refund of service tax paid on the value of inputs for goods exported subject to ceiling of 2% on the FOB value, in respect of BAS. Review Commissioners as well as sole ground of appeal by Revenue proceeds on the premise that the assessee had paid service tax on 3% of the FOB value of export goods (in excess of ceiling limit prescribed in Notification NO.41/2007-ST). Neither in t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tantiated by any probative material which enables a finding of fact to be recorded by the Tribunal. - Decided against Revenue. - Service Tax Appeal No.207 of 2010 - Final Order No. 52169/2015 - Dated:- 7-7-2015 - Mr. Justice G. Raghuram, President and Mr. H.K. Thakur, Technical Member, JJ. For the Petitioner : Shri Govind Dixit, A.R. For the Respondent : None ORDER Per Justice G. Raghuram: Revenue is the appellant. Heard the ld. A.R. representing Revenue. Notice intimating hearing of this 2010 a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on various specified services received and claimed to have been used for export of goods, for the quarter ending March, 008, May, 2008 and September, 2008. 3. The refund claim was scrutinised and prima facie seen to be inconsistent with the mandatory conditions specified in Notification No.41/2007-ST. Therefore, a show cause notice dated 3.2.1989 was issued proposing to disallow the refund claimed. 4. After a due process, the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Agra, by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f goods by the assessee. The appellate Commissioner recorded that since it is established that the assessee had paid service tax, denying the benefit of Notification is unjustified; and that the appellant being exporter was earning foreign exchange for the Nation and deserves to be rewarded by giving benefit of promotional schemes introduced by the Government from time to time. The Appellate Commissioner also recorded that evidence like mentioning the rate of commission on the shipping bills, pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version