Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (10) TMI 2456

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal"), claiming the following substantial questions of law:- (i) Whether in facts & circumstances of present case impugned order is correct as per the prevailing law and facts? (ii) Whether in facts & circumstances of present case impugned order is correct when the CENVAT has been utilized by the appellant in accordance with law? (iii) Whether in facts & circumstances of present case impugned order is correct when the appellant has paid the entire amount much before their due date? (iv) Whether in facts & circumstances of present case impugned order is correct when interest has been demanded from the appellant in contraven .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g the period prior to 1.4.2000. Section 88 of the Finance Act, 2004 (for brevity "2004 Act") amended Rule 3(6) of the 2002 Rules retrospectively providing that only the AED (GSI) credit accrued after 1.4.2000 could be utilized for payment of BED and SED on the finished products and not the credit accrued prior to 1.4.2000. The adjudicating authority vide order dated 19.4.2005 (Annexure A-4) confirmed the duty demand to the tune of Rs. 8,71,12,812/- along with interest and dropped the penalty proceedings. It also dropped the duty demand of Rs. 4,56,50,988/- for the period post April 2000. The appellant vide receipts dated 31.12.2004 (Annexures A-5 and A-6, respectively) deposited the duty of Rs. 8,71,12,812/-. According to the appellant, out .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l stand amended and shall be deemed to have been amended retrospectively in the manner as specified in the Second Schedule, on and from the corresponding date mentioned in column (3) of that Schedule and, accordingly, notwithstanding anything contained in any judgment, decree or order of any court, tribunal or other authority, any action taken or anything done or purported to have been taken or done under the said Explanation shall be deemed to be, and to have always been, for all purposes, as validly and effectively, taken or done as if the said Explanation as amended by this subsection had been in force at all material times. (2) and (3) XX XX XX (4) Recovery shall be made of all such CENVAT credit of additional duty of excise leviabl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n delayed payment of duty.- (1) Where any duty of excise has not been levied or paid or has been short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded, the person who is liable to pay duty as determined under sub-section (2), or has paid the duty under sub-section 2(B), of section 11A, shall, in addition to the duty, be liable to pay interest at such rate not belong ten per cent and not exceeding thirty six per cent per annum, as is for the time being fixed by the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, from the first date of the month succeeding the month in which the duty ought to have been paid under this Act, or from the date of such erroneous refund, as the case may be, but for the provisions contained in sub-section .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iod prior to 1.4.2000 in 2003 immediately after amendment to Rule 3(6) of 2002 Rules. Thus, the interest liability under Section 11AB of the Act would commence from 1st day of the following month when wrong utilization had taken place till the payment of wrongly utilized credit. 8. Further, the appellant had sought to claim benefit of the amendment brought by Section 124 of the Finance Act, 2005. It may be noticed that Section 88 of 2004 Act was amended by adding sub-sections (5) and (6) by Section 124 of the Finance Act, 2005. The relevant clause (v) of sub-section (5) thereof stipulates that interest on the amount of credit utilized for paying CENVAT duty shall be @ 13% per annum for the period beginning on and from the day when each tim .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates