Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Shri Banarasi Dass, L/h Late Smt. Saroj Rani Prop. M/s Shiv Shakti Sarees And Vica-Versa

GP addition - addition was partly sustained by the learned CIT(A) by applying a GP rate of 10% as against 9.67% declared by the assessee and thereby confirming the part addition - Held that:- CIT(A) has passed a well-reasoned order in this case. He has considered the history of the assessee for the relevant year and past two assessment years and has applied a GP rate of 10% as against the GP rate of 12% applied by the Assessing Officer. The assessee was able to declare higher sales at ₹ 3. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f rent paid - Held that:- Assessee has paid the rent of ₹ 60,000/- for the business premises for the whole year as against the rent amount of ₹ 30,000/- paid for the same premises in the immediately preceding year. In reply to a specific query from the Bench, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the rent was revised after more than five years during the relevant period. The Revenue could not controvert the submissions of the assessee that the fair market rent of the busine .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

said to be excessive and accordingly is confirmed - Decided against assessee.

Disallowance of car expenses and car depreciation at 15% of the total expenses and depreciation claimed by the assessee could not be said to be excessive

Unexplained trade creditors - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- Since the balances were on account of purchases made in the normal course of business by the assessee and payments were made through account payee cheques and the assessee w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

for making the addition.- Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No. 4986/Del/2012, ITA No. 5204/Del/2012 - Dated:- 12-10-2015 - Shri G. C. Gupta, Vice President And Shri Om Prakash Kant, Accountant Member For the Petitioner : Shri Sujit Kumar, Senior DR For the Respondent : Shri Akarsh Garg, CA ORDER Per G. C. Gupta, VP These appeals by the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2009-10 are directed against the order of learned CIT(A), Muzaffarnagar dated 27th June, 2012. These are bein .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and therefore the ld.CIT(Appeals) was wholly unjustified in applying the GP rate of 10% (as against 12% by Assessing Officer) instead of 9.67% declared by the appellant. 1.2 Because the application of GP rate of 10% by the learned CIT(Appeals) as against 12% by the Assessing Officer is also wholly arbitrary being not based on any material and therefore partial addition sustained of ₹ 1,03,270/- is contrary to facts and law. 3. Learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the GP additio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ile determining the GP addition in this case. He submitted that during the year, the assessee has declared higher sales of ₹ 3.12 crores and the GP rate of 8.23% as against the sales of ₹ 2.05 crores and GP rate of 8.30% in the immediately preceding year. He submitted that there was no valid reason for sustaining any GP addition in this case. 4. Learned DR has opposed the submissions of the learned counsel for the assessee. He submitted that it was a survey case and the accounts were .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the relevant year and past two assessment years and has applied a GP rate of 10% as against the GP rate of 12% applied by the Assessing Officer. The assessee was able to declare higher sales at ₹ 3.12 crores during the relevant period as against ₹ 2.05 crores in the immediately preceding year with almost same rate of GP as compared to the last year. Learned CIT(A) has rightly allowed credit of ₹ 4.50 lakhs amount surrendered by the assessee during the course of survey and has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he business premises was enhanced from ₹ 30,000/- to ₹ 60,000/- during the year although the market rent was still more. Learned DR has relied on the order of the Assessing Officer. 8. We have considered the rival submissions and have perused the order of the Assessing Officer and learned CIT(A). We find that the assessee has paid the rent of ₹ 60,000/- for the business premises for the whole year as against the rent amount of ₹ 30,000/- paid for the same premises in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

unt of rent paid and the addition made is deleted and ground No.2 of the assessee s appeal is allowed. 9. Ground No.3 of the assessee s appeal is as under:- Because the customer welfare expenses of ₹ 42,536/- were incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business and therefore the ld.CIT(Appeals) has erred in law and on facts in confirming disallowance of ₹ 6,400/-. 10. We have heard the parties. We find that the learned CIT(A) has confirmed the disallowance of ₹ 6,40 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sonal us, amounting to ₹ 21,000/- is highly excessive and keeping in view of the overall facts of the case the ld.CIT(Appeals) should have restricted the same to maximum 10%. 12. We have heard the parties. We find that the disallowance of car expenses and car depreciation at 15% of the total expenses and depreciation claimed by the assessee could not be said to be excessive and therefore, there being no merit in the ground of appeal No.4 of the assessee, the same is dismissed. 13. Ground N .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not fully vouched and the assessee conceded before the Assessing Officer that no vouchers were maintained and that assessee also failed to furnish details of persons, purpose and place of travel. In these facts, we hold that the disallowance was rightly sustained and therefore, the order of learned CIT(A) on this issue is confirmed. Ground No.5 is accordingly dismissed. 15. Ground No.6 reads as under:- Because the generator and repair expenses totaling ₹ 99,915/- were incurred wholly and e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stification for interfering in the order of learned CIT(A) on this count, the same is confirmed and ground No.6 of the assessee s appeal is dismissed. 17. Ground No.7 of the assessee s appeal is as under:- Because sales promotion expenses of ₹ 48,300/-, shop expenses 65,428/-, packing expenses 49143/-, office expenses ₹ 47015/-, totaling ₹ 2,09,886/- were incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business and therefore the ld.CIT(Appeals) has erred in law and on facts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nterference. Accordingly, the order of learned CIT(A) on this issue is confirmed and ground No.7 of the assessee s appeal is dismissed. 19. Ground No.8 & 8.1 of the assessee s appeal read as under:- 8. Because the interest paid @ 15% to the family members was very reasonable and therefore the learned CIT(Appeals) was not justified in confirming the allowable interest rate @ 12% and thereby confirming the addition of ₹ 114315/-. 8.1 Because keeping in view of the facts of the case the l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion for paying higher rate of interest at 15% to the family members of the assessee. 21. We have considered the rival submissions and have perused the order of the Assessing Officer and learned CIT(A). We find that the rate of interest at 15% paid to the family members of the assessee could not be called excessive and seems to be reasonable. The case pertains to the assessment year 2009-10 and considering the prevailing market rate of lending, we are of the view that the interest paid at the ra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Gross Profit by applying the GP rate of 10^ as against 12% applied by the Assessing Officer by ignoring the fact that in the case of Smt. Amrit Rani Prop. M/s Niranjan Dass & Sons, GP was shown @ 16.46% during the relevant accounting period and in the case of Bhagat Ram Godha Ram, Punjabi Market, Saharanpur, GP was shown @ 12.30%. 23. Learned DR has relied on the order of the Assessing Officer. Learned counsel for the assessee has relied on the order of learned CIT(A). 24. We have heard the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dingly, we hold that there is no merit in ground No.1 of the Revenue s appeal, which is dismissed. 25. Ground No.2 reads as under:- On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in law in deleting the disallowance of ₹ 1,51,116/- out of ₹ 2,59,998/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of various expenses by ignoring the fact that these expenses were either excessive or fully unvouched and unverifiable. 26. Learned DR has relied on the order of the Asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd ground No.2 of the Revenue s appeal is dismissed. 28. Ground No.3 of the Revenue s appeal is as under:- On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 10,72,891/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained trade creditors by ignoring the fact that the letters issued by the Assessing Officer were received back un-served, which makes it clear that the trade creditors were not genuine. Whereas the replies/confirmati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

6,24,082/- and not ₹ 10,72,891/- as mentioned by the Revenue in its ground of appeal. He submitted that all the amounts were received by cheque and learned CIT(A) has called for the remand report which was duly submitted by the Assessing Officer. A copy of the remand report has been filed in the compilation before the Tribunal. 30. We have considered the rival submissions and have perused the order of the Assessing Officer and learned CIT(A). We find that the correct amount of trade credit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

made through account payee cheques. The assessee has explained that bills and goods received notes were available on record to prove the genuineness of the creditors. The creditor parties have sent their confirmation letters to the Assessing Officer and the learned CIT(A) has recorded that the Assessing Officer in the remand report dated 18.09.2012 has also confirmed this fact and no defects in the confirmation of accounts of the aforesaid creditors have been pointed out by the Assessing Office .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version