GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (11) TMI 774 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2015 (11) TMI 774 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Demand of interest on reversal of CENVAT Credit - Invocation of extended period of limitation - Interest u/s 11AB - Penalty u/s 11AC - Held that:- The availment of inadmissible credit was never disclosed by the appellant to the department before the audit therefore department was not in position to ascertain whether the credit taken by the appellant is correct or wrong. In view of this position it can be conveniently concluded that there is clear suppres .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d. I therefore held that the interest is chargeable from the date of taking credit in the Cenvat account of the appellant. As regard imposition of penalty under Section 11AC, as I held above extended period is rightly invoked and demand was also rightly confirmed by invoking proviso to Section 11A(1) the provision of Section 11AC would unavoidably attract and accordingly penalty under Section 11AC is sustainable. Even as per Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment in the case of Dharamendra Textile proce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Appeal No. US/ 231/ RGD/2012 dtd. 11/4/2012 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-II) Mumbai, wherein Ld. Commissioner(Appeals) has upheld the Order-in-Original No. Raigad/ADC/162/11-12 dated 17/1/2012 and rejected the appeal of the appellant. The fact of the case is that appellant has wrongly availed Cenvat Credit amounting to ₹ 6,31,914/- however the same was reversed on pointing out by the audit. As regard the admissibility of the credit, the appellant has reversed the c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

belief and moreover they had accumulated balance of Cenvat Credit more than ₹ 4 crores in their Cenvat account, therefore there can not be any intention to wrongly avail a small amount of ₹ 6,31,914/- therefore demand is not sustainable on the ground of time bar. As regard interest he submits that as against credit of ₹ 6,31,914/- they had accumulated balance amount of ₹ 4 crores and disputed credit was not utilized till the date of reversal. He submits that interest is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ce there is no malafide intention in taking such wrong credit on their part and they had accumulated balance of more than ₹ 4 crores which shows their banafide belief. In view of this position proviso to Section 11A(1) is not invokable and consequent penalty under Section 11AC also not imposable. 3. On the other hand, Shri. Rakesh Goyal, Ld. Addl. Commissioner(A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings in the impugned order. He further submits that as regard wrong ava .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case of Union of India Vs. Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd. [2011(265) E.L.T. 3(S.C.). As per this judgment interest is chargeable from the date of credit taken. He also refers to the Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 wherein it is clearly provided that interest shall be recovered where Cenvat Credit has been taken or utilized wrongly or has been erroneously refunded. In view of this unambiguous rule, interest is chargeable from the date of taking credit in to Cenvat account therefore interest was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mposition of penalty under Section 11AC. I have observed that wrong availment of credit was pointed out by the audit officer during the audit. The availment of inadmissible credit was never disclosed by the appellant to the department before the audit therefore department was not in position to ascertain whether the credit taken by the appellant is correct or wrong. In view of this position it can be conveniently concluded that there is clear suppression of fact on the part of the appellant and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ice and the provisions of sections 11A and 11AB of the Excise Act or sections 73 and 75 of the Finance Act, shall apply mutatis mutandis for effecting such recoveries. From plain reading of the Rule 14, it is very clear that interest is chargeable under Section 11AB where the Cenvat credit has been taken or utilized, wrongly refunded. In all the three stages i.e.  credit taken, credit utilized or wrongly refunded interest is chargeable. In the present case, since the appellant has taken wrong .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version