TMI Blog2015 (3) TMI 1101X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etitioner : Dr. Prabhat Kumar, Advocate, Shri S.S. Dabas, Advocate and Shri N. Mullick, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri B.K. Singh, Advocate ORDER Per Rakesh Kumar: This is a misc. application filed by the appellant for waiver of cost of Rs. 25,000/- imposed vide Interim Order No.555-557/14 dated 11.07.2014 by the Tribunal. The stay application filed by the appellants had come up for hear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eceipt of this order and produce challan for fixing the date of hearing. Call the matter on 25th July, 2014. 2. There shall not be any cost in respect of Shri Ravinder Jain, since Shri Naveen Mullick, learned Advocate does not seek unwarranted adjournments. 3. We do understand the difficulties of ld. Counsel Shri Prabhat Kumar when the medical documents are produced before us. But that does n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... had been adjourned by the Bench from time to time sometimes with certain directions, that on 27.06.2014, the Bench had adjourned the matter to 11.07.2014, that on 11.07.2014, he was seriously ill as he was running high fever, that he has produced the Physicians prescription in this regard, that his junior, Shri S.S. Dabas had requested the Bench for adjournment on this ground only, that since the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mar the matter was adjourned to 24.08.2010. From the records, it is seen that between June, 2010 to May, 2014, the matter was adjourned by Bench from time to time for various reasons and the adjournments were not on the request of the Appellant. On some occasions, directions were issued to the department for supply of relied upon documents as well as non-relied upon documents. The other occasion, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the appellants plea for waiver of the cost imposed by the Tribunal's order mentioned above. We do not agree with the plea of the learned Counsel for the Department that the Tribunal cannot modify its interim order dated 11.07.2014 imposing the cost of Rs. 25,000/- on the Appellant. 9. In view of the above discussion, the cost of Rs. 25,000/- imposed on the appellant vide misc. order no.555-557/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|