GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 1387 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2015 (12) TMI 1387 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2016 (343) E.L.T. 651 (Tri. - Del.) - Revocation of CHA License - Misdeclaration of goods - goods were grossly mis-declared in respect of quantity, quality, value and weight etc. and the intention was obviously to defraud the Government by availing of inadmissible drawback amount - Held that:- Apart from goods being mis-declared in description and value, even the weight was much less than the weight declared. In respect of one Shipping Bill, the actual wei .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at he discharges his duties as Customs House Agent with utmost speed and efficiency and without avoidable delay. In the present case, it is evident that the appellant had not obtained any authorisation from M/s H.M. Impex, a firm which was non-existent at the address given in the IE Code and whose proprietor (as mentioned in the IE Code) never contacted the appellant. The appellant filed documents in the name of a nonexistent firm without any verification whatsoever. The documents filed by CHA a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he name of which the documents were filed. Such dereliction of duty on the part of a CHA, can potentially have even graver financial/security consequences. Thus the appellant totally failed to discharge its duties as CHA with utmost speed and efficiency and thereby grossly violated Rule 13 of CHALR, 2004. Such serious violation on the part of the CHA can hardly deserve any condonation or leniency. CESTAT judgement in the case of Pranil Shipping cited by the appellant is hardly applicable to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ch the CHA license of the appellant was revoked by Commissioner of Customs in exercise of the powers conferred upon him under Regulation 22 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, (CHALR) 2004 and also security amount of Rs. one lakh was forfeited under Regulation 20(1) of CHALR, 2004. 2. The appellant CHA had filed two Shipping Bills No. 1287830 and No. 12288039 both dated 17.6.2003 in the name of M/s HM. Impex for readymade garments involving drawback claim of about ₹ 34 lakhs .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ously to defraud the Government by availing of inadmissible drawback amount of over ₹ 34 lakhs. The investigations revealed that M/s H.M. Impex, WZ-156, Madipur, New Delhi- 110 063 (with Shri Rajiv Kumar mentioned as its proprietor in the IE code) was fictitious and did not exist at the given address. It also came out during investigation that Shri Lalit Kumar Katoch, employee of the CHA attended the work relating to filing of papers and examination of goods etc. Shri Sunil Bhatia, proprie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Kumar Katoch to handle the paper work. The Commissioner found the conduct of the appellant in gross violation of the CHALR, 2004 and revoked its CHA license and forfeited the security deposit. 3. The appellant has contended that its proprietor was not aware of the nature of goods and had no knowledge about the mis-declaration and the fraud attempted to be committed in connivance of Shri Lalit Kumar Katoch and that on the particular date the shipping bills were filed, he (i.e. the proprietor) was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e CHA was very much in the know of the fact that the said Shipping Bills were being filed and still its proprietor Shri Bhatia did not take any precaution nor did he ensure due diligence as expected and required of a CHA and therefore the impugned order was legal and proper. The ld. DR cited the judgement of Bombay High Court in the case of CC (General) Vs. Worldwide Cargo Movers - 2010 (253) ELT 190 (Bom.) and CC, Hyderabad-ll Vs. H.B. Cargo Services - 2011 (268) ELT 448 (AP) in support of his .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

value consignment and the drawback involved itself worked out to more than ₹ 34 lakhs. As was revealed during investigation, the person who approached the appellant's employee, Shri Katoch brought hand- written invoices which were typed in the appellant's office itself. Also Shri Katoch did not keep the appellant's proprietor in the dark and he contacted the proprietor on phone who (i.e. the proprietor) gave his go ahead. Such high value consignments would alert any CHA with r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ow the provisions of CHALR, 2004, in terms of which (Regulation No. 13) the Custom House Agent is inter alia required to obtain authorisation from each of the companies/firms by whom he was being employed, ensure that all documents, such as bills of entry and shipping bills delivered in the Customs Station by him show the name of the importer or exporter, as the case may be, and also ensure that he discharges his duties as Customs House Agent with utmost speed and efficiency and without avoidabl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

resent case. Nothing can possibly be a graver mis-conduct on the part of a CHA than to file Shipping Bills of such high value in the name of a non-existent firm without making even preliminary enquiries about the genuineness of firm/company in the name of which the documents were filed. Such dereliction of duty on the part of a CHA, can potentially have even graver financial/security consequences. Thus the appellant totally failed to discharge its duties as CHA with utmost speed and efficiency a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to observe as under: "27. We have noted what the Tribunal has observed in the impugned order. In our view, the finding given by the Enquiring Officer and thereafter the order passed by the appellant in original are fully justified on the facts of the case. The authorities relied upon by Mr. Kantawala undoubtedly are mostly of the Tribunal. Even the judgment of the Calcutta High Court speaks about the suspension of licence not to be continued indefinitely. Here, we are concerned with revocat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ras High Court has been left undisturbed by the Apex Court. It was a case where the CHA had failed to discharge his obligation to exercise proper supervision. In the case of Sri Kamakshi Agency (supra), the CHA was held responsible for the fraudulent activities of a third party whom it had delegated its functions . That was also left undisturbed by the Supreme Court. The present case is some what similar to one of Sri Kamakshi Agency, if not worse. Here, the CHA has brazenly defended his Regulat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r the principles of natural justice are followed and the findings are justified from material on record-Once both these aspects are satisfied if an outsider Tribunal interferes, its findings and order will be improper and perverse which is what has happened in the present case. Similarly when one comes to the disciplinary measures, one must not lose sight of the fact that the appellant-Commissioner of Customs is responsible for happenings in the Customs area and for the discipline to be maintain .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Customs since the CESTAT was not justified in setting aside the revocation of the CHA licence in the facts and circumstances of the case and on the material on record. The order of the CESTAT setting aside the order of the appellant-Commissioner of Customs was clearly perverse in law. Appeal No. 37 of 2006 is, therefore, allowed. The order dated 4-4-2006 passed by the CESTAT is set aside and the order dated 17-1-2006 passed by the appellant-Commissioner of Customs is restored". The ratio co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version