GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (1) TMI 740 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

2016 (1) TMI 740 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD - TMI - Conodonation of delay in filing of an appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) - appellant submitted that the delay in filing appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) occurred mainly due to the reason that the appellant handed over the papers to Advocate Shri S.K. Sharma who did not follow up the case in time. - Held that:- there is no power to condone delay beyond condonable period under Section 85 (3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. - Commissioner (Appeals) c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re engaged in providing taxable service of Management, Maintenance or repair. Proceedings were initiated against them for non-payment of service tax. The Original Authority after due process passed two orders dated 25/05/2011 confirming service tax demand of ₹ 1,72,268/- and ₹ 4,90,454/-. Various penalties were also imposed on the appellant. Aggrieved by this order, the appellants filed before the Commissioner (Appeals). The learned Commissioner (Appeals) vide his order dated 17/11/2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

educated person and he is not aware of the legal procedures relating to service tax. He wholly relied on the Advocate who did not follow up the case in time resulting in the huge delay in filing appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). 3. The learned AR submits that there is a delay of more 800 days in filing appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals). As per the provisions of Section 85 of Finance Act, 1994 an appeal against orders of the Adjudicating Authority has to be filed within two months .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

law for admitting such appeal. The Tribunal has no powers to direct the lower Appellate Authority to consider such appeal in view of the clear time limit mentioned in the Act itself. He further relied on the Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Singh Enterprises vs. CCE, Jamshedpur reported in 2008 (221) E.L.T. 163 (S.C.). In the said case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court dealing with the powers of Commissioner (Appeals) in Central Excise matters held that when the statute presc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e is no powers conferred on any authority to extend the appeal period provided by the Finance Act 1994, with respect to appeals before Commissioner (Appeals). The learned Counsel for the appellant submitted some case laws and contended that the Tribunal has power to direct the Commissioner (Appeals) to admit the appeal in view of the special circumstances. I have examined the case laws submitted by the learned Counsel and find that they deal with the legal provision as governed by different unre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ingh & Others reported in 2010 (28) LCD 1531 was discussing again Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 with reference to CPC. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag and another vs. MST, Katiji and others in Civil appeal No. 460 of 1987 was again dealing with Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 with reference to compensation to be paid on land acquisition. The Hon'ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir in the case of Union of India vs. Godrej Agrovet .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

elay of 262 days in filing appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal in the case of Dhiman Industries (Regd.) vs. CCE, Jallandhar reported in 2004 (62) R.L.T. 520 (CESTAT - Del.) held that a delay of 12 days can be condoned by the Commissioner (Appeals) on account of misplacement of case papers by the Advocate. In Indam Recycling Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. CC, Cochin reported in 2009 (246) E.L.T. 687 (Tri. - Bang.), the Tribunal held that delay in filing appeal before the Tribunal caused due to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppeal remedy is not provided to him. I find that the statutory time limit provided in the Finance Act, 1994 cannot be over-turned by any authority created by the statute. There is no provision for any condonation beyond the period as stipulated in the provision of Finance Act, 1994. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Singh Enterprises (supra) categorically held that when the statute prescribed a particular period of limitation, the court cannot direct condonation as that would render a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version