Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (1) TMI 876 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (1) TMI 876 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2015 (330) E.L.T. 470 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Addendum to show-cause notice after receipt of the reply to show-cause - Export of other rice in the name of Basmati Rice - export of Non-Basmati Rice was prohibited - Confiscation of goods - Held that:- the learned Commissioner has erred in issuing addendum to show-cause notice after receipt of the reply to show-cause notice dated 18.12.2009. The addendum is also vitiated on the ground that there is no reference in the s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

id Circular, I find that the export of ‘PUSA 1121' variety is also permitted. - the goods (rice under export) was not liable to confiscation - Decided in favor of assessee - Decided against the revenue. - Appeal No.C/444 & 643/10 and C/602 & 639/10 - Final Order Nos. A/2306-2309/2015-WZB(SMB) - Dated:- 12-9-2015 - Anil Choudhary, Member (J) For the Appellant: Shri N D George, Adv., and Shri J R Sharma, Supdt. (AR) For the Respondent: Shri J R Sharma, Supdt. (AR), Shri N D George, Adv. JUDGEMENT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eclaration of export Remarks 7126219 dt. 27.2.09 3 Basmati Rice LEO given and exported 7126230 dt. 27.2.09 3 -do- Detained. Back to town allowed on bond & Bank Guarantee- As rice not appeared to be Basmati. 7134204 dt. 2.3.2009 5 -do- Detained. Back to town allowed on Bond & Bank Guarantee. As rice not appeared to be Basmati. Thereafter, the balance 8 containers in the aforesaid two shipping bills were examined under Panchnama dated 23.3.2009/24.3.2009 and samples were drawn. It appeared .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ation. On execution of Bank Guarantee and Bonds by the exporter, the goods were allowed to be taken back to town on or about 3.6.3009. The show-cause notice dated 18.12.2009 was issued on the exporter Chawla Trading Company alleging therein that as per the statement of Shri Daulatram Laxmandas Chawla, Proprietor of M/s Chawla Trading Company, it was stated that they had engaged CHA - M/s M.K. Shipping Services to handle clearance of the goods and the goods were stuffed in the said container. Fur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ously at different points, so it was not physically possible for them to remain at one point. Further, the exporter was a regular exporter and they did not notice anything adverse about them. Further, there was a load shedding in the area and stuffing continues till late hours and due to over burden of work, there was a possibility that the exporter might have taken advantage of the situation and manipulated/replaced the goods as in the same godown, there were locally saleable items including ri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd as such, the appellant was required to show cause as to why the seized goods being 3150 kg of Basmati Rice should not be confiscated along with 193965 kg of non-basmati rice valued at ₹ 43,32,552/-. Further, why no penalty be imposed under Section 114(i) of the Act and further why not Bank Guarantee submitted be enforced and appropriated. 2.1 The appellant contested the show-cause by filing reply dated 6.2.2010 and filed a further reply dated 12.10.2010. The show-cause notice was adjudi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rm wherein he did not dispute the recovery of non-basmati rice along with Basmati rice and further reliance was placed by the Commissioner on statements of the Customs Officers, who had stated that due to heavy workload they could not supervise loading through out, and further due to load shedding in the warehouse, hence there was possibility of manipulation. Relying on the same, the learned Commissioner held that the exporter have tried to export non-basmati rice, as basmati rice. 2.2 So far th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at as regards testing of samples from Agmark Testing Centre', the requirement of testing is only to identify whether the goods are as declared by the exporter or otherwise and accordingly, held the report dated 27.8.2009 brought on record by the Addendum to show-cause notice dated 25.3.2010, is acceptable. It is further observed that the importer has no where disputed the fact that the consignment contained non-basmati rice and accordingly, held the basmati rice in question is liable to conf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ply to the show-cause notice, no corrigendum/addendum can be issued by the Revenue authorities. Further, no reference was made in the show-cause notice dated 18.12.2009, that any samples were forwarded for testing. Further reliance is placed on Division Bench ruling of this Tribunal in the case of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise- 2006 (190) ELT 92 (Tri-Mum),wherein this Tribunal has held that no corrigendum or addendum to show-cause notice can be issued after rece .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

prescribed laboratory and as such, the report is not reliable. DGFT Policy Circular No. 33/08 refers to earlier Notification No. 39 dated 16.9.2008 which provides that export of basmati rice is allowable based on the size of the grain, length of more than 7 mm and grain length to breadth ratio of more than 3.6 is allowable. Further, export of non-basmati rice PUSA 1121" having grain length of more than 7 mm and grain length to breadth ration of more than 4.0 has been allowed. The notificat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

they have not considered the permissibility of PUSA 1121 rice and thus, the whole proceedings is vitiated. Further, as it is evident from the lab report, belatedly brought on record, that the size prescribed has not been considered, as prescribed by DGFT Circular and as such, the report is vitiated on this issue also. (iv) Further ground raised is that the Customs Officers, who supervised the stuffing, have stated that they found the rice in question as Basmati rice and as such the whole proceed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd Processed Foods Development Authority -APEDA". It is further urged that the export of non-basmati rice has been prescribed by DGFT's Notification No. 38/07 and accordingly, the goods under export were fit for absolute confiscation and as such the learned Commissioner have erred in not confiscating the consignment absolutely and giving option to redeem. 4.1 Further ground raised is that if it is found that the goods are liable for confiscation absolutely, the Revenue could have earned .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version