Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Sanjivani SSK Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad

2016 (1) TMI 1054 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Recovery of transport charges separately by way of debit notes - whether amount to declaring transport charges separately or not? - Held that:- In view of the admitted fact that the appellant assessee have recovered transport charges by separate transport bills/debit notes, which is of even date as the date of invoice and all other details given in the debit notes like, place of delivery, name of the party, name of the goods, quantity etc. can be correlated to the excise invoice, we hold that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

impugned order is set aside. - Appeal No. E/1636/05 - Final Order No. A/2819/2015-WZB/SMB - Dated:- 10-8-2015 - Anil Choudhary, Member (J) And Raju, Member (T) For the Appellant : Ms Padmavati Patil, Adv For the Respondent : Shri Ashutosh Nath, Assistant Commissioner ORDER Per Anil Choudhary The appellant-assessee is in appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. BPS(50)/9/2005 dated 27/2/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Aurangabad. 2. The issue in the appeal is whether recov .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ir own tanker, the appellant raises a separate transport bill bearing the name of buyer as mentioned, Excise Invoice no. as mentioned, the total duty as mentioned, Vehicle No. of the Tanker as mentioned for the particulars of the goods being delivered and the transport charges etc. All these information in the transport bill/debit notes correspond to the Central Excise Invoice. 3.1 A show-cause notice dated 1.6.2004 was issued observing that the appellant has recovered transport charges from the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

when it is shown separately in the Invoice by the assessee. In the facts of the present case, the assessee is not showing transport charges separately and they are recovering the same by raising debit notes. Accordingly, it was proposed to recover the duty short paid being an amount of ₹ 2,67,443/- under Section 11A without invoking the extended period, for the period 1.7.2000 to 30.6.2003. 3.2 The show-cause notice dated 1.6.2004 was adjudicated and proposed demands were confirmed by Orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

they were required to pay duty on the transaction value as defined under Section 4(3)(d) of the Act. Accordingly, it has been held that transport charges recovered separately in connection with sale of excisable goods are includible in the transaction value for the purpose of payment of duty. However, for the period from 1.3.2003 to 30.6.2003, he dropped the demand on the ground that under Rule 5 of the Valuation rules, the following portion is deleted:- "provided cost of transportation as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er urged that recovery of transport charges by separate transport bills/debit notes amounts to disclosure/transport charges separately and fulfills the requirement of the Rules and the same cannot be clubbed with the transaction value. It is further urged that during the relevant period, factory' was the place of removal under Section 4(3)(c) and further pointed out that the depot or any other place or premises from where the goods are being sold was introduced in Section 4(3)(c) w.e.f. 14.5 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he transport charges are not includible in the transaction value. Similar view has been taken by the Tribunal in the case of National Peroxide Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane - I - 2013 (298) ELT 423 (Tri-Mum) and Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolhapur vs. Star Oxochem Pvt. Ltd. - 2013 (289) ELT 165 (Tri-Mum). 5. Learned DR relies on the impugned order and further states that as the transport charges have been raised and recovered separately, the same are includible. He states t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r designing, manufacturing, providing at site, laying, jointing and testing of PSC pipes of specified sizes. The agreement required the assessee, for delivery of the finished goods not at the factory gate, but the premises of the buyer. The Apex Court held after going through the terms and conditions of the contract, it is clear that the goods have to be delivered at the place of buyer and it was only at that place where the acceptance of supplies was to be effected and as such price of transact .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version