New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (1) TMI 1062 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (1) TMI 1062 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - [2016] 94 VST 251 (CESTAT) - Renting of immovable property on profit sharing basis - demand of service tax on renting including on notional interest received on the security deposit made with the appellants. - Held that:- As the issue has already been settled in appellants own case for earlier period, that the appellant is not liable to pay service tax under the category of renting of immovable property service as leasing out the property to Hotel under the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed:- 12-1-2016 - SHRI ASHOK JINDAL, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND MR. R K SINGH, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Petitioner : Shri Rachit Jain, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Ranjan Khanna, AR ORDER PER ASHOK JINDAL : The appellant is in appeal along with application for stay against the demand confirmed against them on account of renting of immovable property service and notional interest received on the security deposit made with the appellants. 2. Revenue has also filed an appeal for imposing penalty .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder the category of renting of immovable property service. It was also proposed that as appellant has received a security deposit of ₹ 20 crores, therefore, the notional interest on the security deposit, appellant is liable to pay the service tax. In these set of facts, a show cause notice was issued to the appellant for the period 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 to demand service tax as discussed above. The matter was adjudicated, demand of service tax was confirmed along with interest and vario .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to pay service tax under the category of renting of immovable property service. He further submits that they are not required to pay service tax and notional interest accrued on the security deposit as held by this Tribunal in the case of K Raheja Corp. Ltd vs CCE, Pune III - [2015-TIOL-100-CESTAT-MUM] Therefore, impugned order is liable to be set aside. 5. On the other hand, learned AR opposed the contention of the learned Counsel and submits that at the time of leasing out the property to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version