Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (2) TMI 690 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (2) TMI 690 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Demand of service tax on Management, Maintenance or Repair service collected from Flat owners. - It was contended that builder is under obligation to maintain the building and the appellant only taken re-imbursement of various services which was provided by various service provider. Therefore the appellant has neither provided the service nor retained the amount of maintenance with them - Held that:- In this fact the appellant is not liable for service ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/KS/ST dated 29/11/2011 passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai- V, wherein Ld. Commissioner has confirmed the service tax demand of ₹ 9,886/- under the category of Transport of Goods by Roads Service, service tax amount of ₹ 58,66,991/- under the category of Management, Maintenance or Repair Service, demanded interest, imposed penalty of ₹ 58,76,877/- and appropriate the amount of 28,305/- and ₹ 6,974/- (interest) which was already paid by the appellant before .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Meanwhile before issuance of show cause notice, appellant deposited ₹ 28,305/- and ₹ 6,974/- against entire service tax demanded on GTA service and interest. 3. Shri S.S. Gupta, ld. C.A. alongwith Shri. Archit, Agrawal, Ld. C.A. appearing on behalf of the appellant is not contesting. The appellant has already paid an amount of ₹ 28,305/- alongwith interest which is much higher than the demand confirmed in the order. As regard service tax on Management, Maintenance or Repair se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r retained the amount of maintenance with them. Therefore the appellant has neither provided the service nor retained the amount of maintenance with them. Therefore no service is involved and appellant is not liable for any service tax on so called Management, Maintenance or Repair service of the building. He submits that this issue has been settled in the case of Kumar Beharay Rathi vs. C. Ex, Pune -3 [2014(34) STR 139(Tri)]. In view of this judgment, the demand confirmed by the impugned order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng Section 73(3) as well as Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. 4. On the other hand, Shri. Sanjeev Nair, Ld. Examiner (A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. 5. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides and perused the records. 6. We find that as regard demand of service tax on GTA service there is no dispute about the taxability of service. Hence the demand of Service Tax on GTA service confirmed in the impugned order is u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version