Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s SDS Ramcides Cropscience Pvt Ltd (Formerly Sree Ramcides Chemicals Pvt Ltd) Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

2016 (3) TMI 80 - ITAT CHENNAI

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - disallowances on difference of calculation of 80IB deduction - addition u/s.69C on account of expenditure and interest from bank - Held that:- On the issue of deprecation of Jammu unit due to mistake of the assessee company at the time of filing of return deduction was not claimed and subsequently revised computation of income was filed in addition to revised computation of 80IB deduction. The assessee company explained the circumstances of deduction u/s.80IB to the Asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

genuine reason for the assessee to file petitions as per the law and claimed relief. Further, the assessee has not furnished any inaccurate particulars on the issue of depreciation and we rely on the decision of Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. Reliance Petro Products Ltd [2010 (3) TMI 80 - SUPREME COURT ].

In respect of addition of unexplained expenditure of ₹ 3,29,664/- the assessee has not reconciled the payments of Bank account with books of accounts maintained though the D .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome Tax (Appeals). However, no bonafide explanation from the assessee side for making inaccurate particulars to the Department. Considering the facts and circumstances of penalty, we direct the Assessing Officer to recompute penalty in respect of sustained addition of unexplained expenditure ₹ 3,29,664/-and unclaimed receipts of ₹ 11,950/- only - Decided partly in favour of assessee - ITA No. 101/2014 - Dated:- 22-1-2016 - Chandra Poojari, AM And G. Pavan Kumar, JM For the Appellant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fficer on difference of calculation of 80IB deduction, addition u/s.69C on account of expenditure and interest from bank. 3. The Brief facts of the are case that the assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacturer of insecticides and filed return on income within due date on 24.08.2009 disclosing Total income of ₹ 12,12,95,604/- subsequently, case was selected for scrutiny and notices were issued. In the assessment proceedings, the ld. Authorised Representative submitted inform .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dition u/s.69C of the Act on basis of the AIR transactions with American Express Banking Corp. ₹ 3,29,664/- as unexplained expenditure. Further, the Assessing Officer based on the 26AS found that the assessee has not offered interest on bank deposit amounting to ₹ 11,950/- and taxed as unaccounted receipts. The Assessing Officer completed assessment by above additions and assessed total income at ₹ 12,66,60,264/- and raised demand. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer initiated .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

u/Se 80IB and proposed steps for rectify the mistake. Further, In respect of payment to American Express Banking Corp, the ld. Authorised Representative submitted that the assessee company has incurred ₹ 26,79,737/- towards business expenditure and unreconciled aggregate amount being ₹ 3,29,664/-. The interest income from bank as per the 26AS was taxed by the Assessing Officer as the company is following mercantile Accounting system. But the Assessing Officer completed the penalty p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

material information before the Assessing Officer in the assessment proceedings and paid taxes. But on the issue of disallowance of depreciation, there is omission on the part of the company to disallow the deprecation under Companies Act and to claim depreciation as per Income Tax Rules. In order to buy peace with the Income Tax department assessee has accepted the additions in respect of unexplained expenditure and interest receipts. The assessee filed appeal against the order u/s.143(3) of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re the Tribunal, the ld. Authorised Representative argued the grounds raised against penalty order and assessee company has voluntarily accepted the mistake which has crept in calculation of deprecation and also filed revised computation of income with Sec.80IB working. The ld.AR reiterated that in order to buy peace the assessee has accepted the addition of unexplained expenditure and unaccounted receipts. Further, all the material facts were disclosed before completion of assessment and co-ope .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s and the petitions filed by the assessee the Assessing Officer passed Sec. 154 order and allowed deduction. Further, ld.Authorised Representative drew attention to page No. 3 of paper book containing the ledger accounts copies of American Express Banking Corp with details of payments and closing balance. The bank interest difference arised due to non receipt of TDS certificate before finalization of accounts and prayed for deletion of penalty. 6. .On the other hand, the ld. Departmental Represe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

computation of income was filed in addition to revised computation of 80IB deduction. The assessee company explained the circumstances of deduction u/s.80IB to the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and filed rectification petition u/s.154 against the order of Sec.143(3) of the Act and also against the order of 271(1)(c) of the Act. Finally, the ld. Assessing Officer has considered rectification petition dated 21.04.2015 of the assessee and passed order dated 7.7.2015 all .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version