Tax Management India. Com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

XAVIER J. PULIKKAL Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

2016 (3) TMI 167 - SUPREME COURT

Deduction u/s 54F - Held that:- We modify the impugned judgment by directing that the Assessing Officer shall consider the matter de novo without being influenced by any observation made by the High Court in [2014 (4) TMI 211 - KERALA HIGH COURT], in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

neral of India and K. Radhakrishnan, Senior Advocate (K. Parameshwar, Ms. Swarupma Chaturvedi and Subhas Acharya for Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocates, with them) for the respondent. JUDGMENT 1. Heard the learned counsel. 2. Leave granted. 3. Looking at t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version