Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (3) TMI 715 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (3) TMI 715 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2016 (43) S.T.R. 455 (Tri. - Del.) - Demand of Service tax for the period 2004-2005 to 2007-2008 - Construction of complex service - Failure to pay tax liability in respect of 50% of the constructed property assigned to the owners of the land in terms of the Joint Development agreement - Held that:- Department's contention that CBEC Circular dated 29/1/2009 not applicable to appellant's case is not accepted. The main point of clarification by the CBEC is on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nable. - Decided in favour of appellant - Service Tax Appeal No. 55 of 2011 - Final Order No. 51003/2016 - Dated:- 4-3-2016 - SHRI ASHOK JINDAL, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND SHRI B. RAVICHANDRAN, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Petitioner : Ms. Rinky Arora, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Amresh Jain, Authorized Representative (DR) ORDER PER. B. RAVICHANDRAN :- This appeal is against order dated 15/10/2010 of Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur. The appellants are registered with the Department for providing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ners, the appellants were not discharging the service tax. Proceedings initiated against the appellant resulted in the order-in-original dated 14/12/2009 confirming demand of ₹ 5,17,134/- and imposing equal amount of penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. Further penalty was also imposed under Section 76 of the Act. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) vide the impugned order rejected the appeal. Aggrieved, the appellant is before us in appeal. 2. The learned Counsel for the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

attract service tax. Reliance was placed by the learned Counsel on various decisions of the Tribunal and Hon ble High Courts in support of their claim. 3. The learned AR reiterated the findings of the lower Authorities. 4. We have heard both the sides and examined the appeal records. We find that service tax demand against the appellant has been confirmed on the ground that they have failed to pay their tax liability in respect of 50% of the constructed property assigned to the owners of the lan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version