2016 (3) TMI 982

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in RC.13959/2002/C3 dated 09.02.2004 and consequent notice dated 16.02.2004 issued by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same and to direct the 1st respondent to pass orders afresh in accordance with the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax (Settlement of Dispute .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the representations dated 08.02.2003 and 01.03.2003. 3. As per Section 6(1) of the Act, the Designated Authority shall take into consideration the amount of penalty paid by the applicant before filing the application and deduct the amount so paid by him from the amount determined under Section 6(1). 4. In the case on hand, the 1st respondent passed the order finding that the amount paid towards .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... resh and pass orders after taking into consideration the objections raised by the petitioner and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 7. At the time of admission of the Writ Petition, this Court, by order dated 03.03.2004, directed the petitioner to deposit 50% of the amount demanded in the impugned notice. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that pursuant to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X