Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 161 - ITAT DELHI

2016 (4) TMI 161 - ITAT DELHI - TMI - Penalty u/s 271B - non comply with the provisions of Section 44AB - Held that:- It appears that the assessee got his accounts audited relating to regular business of manufacturing of GLS Lamps. However, no audit was got conducted in respect of the transaction relating to sale and purchase of shares. In the instant case, this contention of the assessee that the transaction relating to purchase and sale of shares resulted into short term capital loss and the t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

loss or adjusted against the regular business income and that the shares sold by the assessee were kept as a stock-in-trade. Therefore, the provisions of Section 44AB of the Act were not applicable to the transaction relating to sale & purchase of shares and the penalty u/s 271B of the Act levied by the AO and sustained by the ld. CIT(A) was not justified, therefore, the same is deleted. - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. 4996/Del/2013 - Dated:- 26-2-2016 - N K Saini, AM And Beena Pillai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e on 30.09.2008 declaring an income of ₹ 3,19,850/-which was subsequently revised on 20.10.2008 at the same income. However, assessment was completed ex-parte at an income of ₹ 32,18,840/- u/s 144 of the Act. The assessee was engaged in the business of trading of shares and manufacturing of GLS Lamps under the proprietorship M/s R.S. Electrical. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings noticed that the assessee apart from the business of M/s R.S. Electrical had entered into .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee carried the matter to the ld. CIT(A) and submitted that it was not a case where absolutely no compliance had been made u/s 44AB of the Act but was a case where compliance u/s 44AB of the Act could not be made with respect to one segment of business, therefore, provisions of Section 271B of the act were not applicable. It was further stated that the assessee had considered the sale and purchase of shares as transaction involving capital assets and therefore, it remained outside the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee to show as to how the purchase and sale transactions of the shares were treated by him in the books of accounts i.e. whether the shares were held as stock in trade or as an investment. The ld. CIT(A) held that the assessee's accounts relating to the business activity of trading in shares were not audited as required under the provisions of Section 44AB of the Act. He accordingly confirmed the penalty levied by the AO. 6. Now the assessee is in appeal. The ld. Counsel for the assesse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version