Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Soundarya Decorators Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai

2016 (4) TMI 371 - CESTAT CHENNAI

Availment of Cenvat credit - Service tax paid on outdoor catering and rent a cab service - Appellant claimed that period of dispute is prior to 01.04.2011 and hence, they are eligible for credit though they have taken credit of the said services in their cenvat account during June, 2011 - Held that:- the appellant has availed Cenvat credit facility on outdoor catering service provided in the factory premises to its employees and also provided rent a cab service to its employees/officers of the C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

RT] and decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CCE & ST, LTU, Chennai Vs. M/s. Turbo Energy Ltd. [2015 (3) TMI 632 - MADRAS HIGH COURT], the cost of input services that forms part of, the Cenvat credit availed in respect of outdoor catering service and rent a cab service is eligible as input services. - Decided in favour of appellant - E/40134/2015 - Final Order No. 40586 / 2016 - Dated:- 30-3-2016 - SHRI P.K. CHOUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER For the Petitioner : Ms. Sridevi, Adv. For th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

service amounting to ₹ 6,313/-. The appellant claimed that the period of dispute is prior to 01/04/2011 and hence, they are eligible for credit though they have taken credit of the said services in their cenvat account during June, 2011. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand/recovery of ineligible credit of ₹ 10,273/- along with interest and imposed a penalty of ₹ 1,000/- under Rule 15 of the Cenvat credit Rules, 2004. On appeal, the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) sustain .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tation of the employees/officers of the company in order to avoid unnecessary delay in executing the day to day business activities of the Company. She further submits that the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has observed that the impugned services were consumed in relation to their business in general and hence, there is no dispute from this point. The decision of the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Chennai Vs. Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd. - 2010 (19) STR 172 , nolonger holds good, as the same has been .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent-a-cab service The credit on such service shall be available if its provision had been completed before 01.04.2011. She relied on the following citations: 1. CCE, Bangalore Vs. Stanzen Toyotetsu India (P) Ltd.-2011 (23) STR 444 (Kar.) 2. CCE, Ahmedabad Vs. Ferromatik Milacron India Ltd.-2011 (21) STR 8 (Guj.) 3. CCE, Nagpur Vs. Ultratech Cement Ltd.-2010 (260) ELT 369 (Bom.) 4. Central Bank of India Vs. CCE & ST, Coimbatore-2012-TIOL-1314-CESTAT-MAD 3. The Ld. AR Shri S. Mohan, AC, reiter .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version