Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Commissioner of Income-Tax, The Income-Tax Officer Versus Kishore Rao And Others (Huf)

2016 (4) TMI 430 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - lesser deduction of tds - ITAT allowed the claim - Held that:- There are two angles to the matter: The first is, whether it was a case of `no deductioní or not in the present case. The answer would be in the negative because, the deduction was already made at the rate of 1%. The second angle would be as to whether it was under a bona fide wrong impression that only 1% was deducted instead of 2%. The contention of the assessee was that, having realized that deduction .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he contention of the assessee that in the middle of year, there is change of law about the deduction, as well as on the non-availability of the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia), when the issue is covered by the Calcutta High Court Judgment in case of S.K.Tekriwal [2012 (12) TMI 873 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT ], we do not find that any substantial question of law would arise for consideration as sought to be canvassed. - Decided against revenue - ITA No. 660/2015 - Dated:- 17-3-2016 - Jayant Patel And .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e to facts of the present case and when the ingredients of Section 194H and 40(a) (ia) are satisfied in the instant case? 2. We have heard Mr.Arvind, learned counsel appearing for appellant-Revenue. 3. The relevant discussion in the impugned order of the Tribunal on the aforesaid aspect is at paragraphs 5.3 to 5.3.3 which read as under: "5.3.1 We have heard the rival contentions on the ground at S.No.5 and perused and carefully considered the material on record; including the judicial prono .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessee, the balance TDS was paid on 31.1.2011 along with interest under Section 201(1A) of the Act. The Assessing Officer, on examination of the assessee's claim, was of the view that deduction of tax at a lower rate cannot be taken as TDS made in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII-B and, following the decisions of the Chennai ITAT in the case of Frontier Offshore Exploration (I) Ltd. (supra) and Pixie Enterprises (supra), held that even in case of short deduction, the liabi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the nature of payments made under TDS provisions, no disallowance can be made by invoking the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. We have had occasion to peruse the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta in the case of S.K. Tekriwal (supra), wherein their Lordships had considered the very same issue of the applicability of the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act in a case where there was short deduction of tax at source on payments made to sub-contractors and find tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the assessee and against Revenue. At paras 2 and 3 of its order, the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta has held as under:- "2. The reasoning appearing at paragraph 6 of the judgment and/or order under challenge reads as follows: "In the present case before us the assessee has deducted tax under Section 194C(2) of the Act being payments made to subcontractors and it is not a case of nondeduction of tax or no deduction of tax as is the import of section 40a(ia) of the Act. But the re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

isallowed the payments proportionately by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The ld. CIT, DR also argued that there is no word like failure used in section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and it referred to only nondeduction of tax and disallowance of such payments. According to him, it does not refer to genuineness of the payment or otherwise but addition under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act can be made even though payments are genuine but tax is not deducted as required under section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent case before us, the assessee has deducted tax under Section 194C(2) of the Act and not under Section 194I of the Act and there is no allegation that this TDS is not deposited with the Government account. We are of the view that the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act has two limbs one is where, inter alia, assessee has to deduct tax and the second where after deducting tax, inter alia, the assessee has to pay into Govt. Account. There is nothing in the said section to treat, inter ali .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y to deduct tax and pay to government account. If there is any shortfall due to any difference of opinion as to the taxability of any item or the nature of payments falling under various TDS provisions, the assessee can be declared to be an assessee in default under Section 201 of the Act and no disallowance can be made by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Accordingly, we confirm the order of CIT (Appeals) allowing the claim of assessee and this issue of revenue s appeal i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue to any difference of understanding or opinion as to the taxability of any item or the nature of payments falling under various TDS provisions and therefore reverse the findings of the authorities below and allow the assessee s appeal in respect of Ground No.5." The aforesaid shows that the Tribunal has gone by the decision taken by the High Court of Calcutta and has found that it was not a case of no deduction of TDS whatsoever and therefore, the provisions of Section 40(a) and (ia) of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent was credited in the Revenue in time whereas, in the present case, the TDS was deducted at a lesser rate but no payment was credited with the revenue in time. 5. He submitted that, as per Scheme of Sec.40(a) (ia) of the Act read with proviso, if no deduction is made, the amount is disallowable as revenue expenditure and if TDS is made succeeding year, it would be admissible in that year and not the year in which the claim has been made. In his submission, the decision of Calcutta High Court i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version