Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (4) TMI 765

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ra, Adv. and Mr. S. Ghosh, Adv For the Respondent : Mr. S. B. Saraf, Adv. and Mr. K. K. Maiti, Adv ORDER The Court : The petitioner has assailed an order dated June 10, 2004 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. By the impugned order, the appellate tribunal has refused to entertain an appeal against an order dated June 21, 2002 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he has relied upon 1986 (23) E.L.T 14 (Cal) (Rungta Sons (P) Ltd. And Another versus Collector of Customs, Visakhapatnam and Others). Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the claim for service of the original notice cannot be accepted in absence of actual proof of delivery. This view has been expressed by the appellate tribunal in a decision reported at 2006 (202) E.L.T 244 as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d by the impugned order dated June 10, 2004. The appellate tribunal has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner primarily on two counts. The first ground being the fact that the petitioner was served with the original order dated July 14, 1987. The appellate tribunal found that the same was sought to be sent under registered post with acknowledgment due card at the registered address of the petiti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ice, the petitioner cannot be said to have been served with the original order dated July 14, 1987 in spite of the fact that the same was sent by registered post with acknowledgment due card. None of the three decisions relied upon on behalf of the petitioner is on a factual situation where after 14 years a proof of delivery is sought to be examined. In the present case, the petitioner had approa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e proceedings. It chose not to appear thereon. It chose to issue a letter dated July 13, 1987 and thereafter did not follow it up or kept itself abreast with the developments or the progress of the adjudicatory proceedings. A prudent person acting reasonably is expected to keep a track of the proceedings. The ratio of Rungta (Sons) (Supra) therefore has no manner of application in the facts of thi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates