Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ITO, Ward-2 (1) , Guntur Versus New Sarika Cotton Traders

Interest on sundry debtors - Held that:- The debtor went into liquidation and the matter is pending before the BIFR. On further verification of the details submitted by the assessee, we find that the lenders have taken the possession of the assets of the company and given notice for auction. Under these circumstances, the A.O. was incorrect in charging interest on the outstanding debtor balance, when recovery of principal is in doubtful. The Assessing Officer, simply estimated the interest on th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee and assessee is in the business of money lending to charge interest on the outstanding balance by following the mercantile system of accounting. Though, assessee charged interest for the last financial year, he explained the reasons for not charging the interest for the current financial year under consideration. From the perusal of the facts, it appears that the reasons given by the assessee appears to be reasonable. Therefore, we are of the opinion that charging interest on trade debtors is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t Member: This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of CIT(A), Guntur dated 8.2.2012 and it pertains to the assessment year 2008-09. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a partnership firm, which is engaged in the business of trading in cotton, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2008-09 on 8.9.2008 declaring total loss of Rs. 5,11,538/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and accordingly, notices u/s 143(2) & 142(1) of the In .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

levant to assessment year 2007-08. However, the assessee has failed to charge any interest for the year under consideration, therefore, issued a show cause notice and asked to explain why interest shall not be charged for the current financial year. In response to show cause notice, the assessee filed its written submission and stated that the balance shown in the name of M/s. Kumar Kotex Limited was on account of supply of goods. The debtor owed money for the past 6 years and has not paid any a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al position was very weak and it is not in a position to pay the outstanding balance. Under these circumstances, charging interest on the outstanding amount is not correct. However, the Assessing Officer after considering the explanations furnished by the assessee held that the assessee has been actively in the trading activity with M/s. Kumar Kotex Ltd. by supplying goods for the last 6 years. Though the assessee has not received any amounts due from the debtor, the assessee has not taken any s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al before the CIT(A). Before the CIT(A), the assessee reiterated the submissions made before the Assessing Officer. The assessee further submitted that the debtor company s financial position was very weak and it went to BIFR for liquidation. The bankers have taken the possession of the assets of the company. Therefore, we are not in a position to recover even principal outstanding from the debtor and hence, charging interest on the same does not serve any purpose. The assessee further submitted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

effort proved to be futile, therefore, we stopped charging interest from the current financial year onwards. The CIT(A), after considering the submissions of the assessee deleted the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The CIT(A) held that it is a fact borne out of records that during the year under consideration, the debtor was under BIFR. The CIT(A) further held that as seen from the records, the financial position of the trade debtor has gone very bad to worse and in the given circumstan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

submitted that the assessee has not taken any steps to collect the amount due from the debtor and more over continued its business activity with the debtor, therefore, A.O. is rightly charged interest on the outstanding balance. The Ld. D.R. further submitted that the assessee itself, for the financial year 2006-07 has charged interest on the outstanding debtor balance, but failed to offer any reasons for not charging the interest for the current financial year. Under these circumstances, the or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

offered any reasons for not charging the interest on the outstanding debtor balance. The A.O. further held that even though, debtor not paid the amount for the past 6 years, the assessee continued to supply the goods and not made any efforts to recover the amount due from the debtors. Therefore, charged interest based on the assessee own admission for the earlier year. It was the contention of the assessee that the debtor s financial position is very bad and the debtor is not in a position to p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rest on the outstanding debtor balance. As a matter of fact, for the previous financial year, we charged interest to create pressure on the assessee to make the payment. However, we realized that our efforts proved to be futile, therefore, we stopped charging interest. 6. The assessee contended that the A.O. cannot charge interest on sundry debtors, as there was no such condition for charging interest. We find force in the arguments of the assessee for the reason that it is not a case of A.O. th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reement between the assessee and debtors. The A.O. has not brought on record any evidence, to show that such agreement is existed between the parties to justify his action. 7. The assessee contends that the financial position of debtor is weak and its efforts are not yielded any results of recovery. On perusal of the records, we find that the debtor went into liquidation and the matter is pending before the BIFR. On further verification of the details submitted by the assessee, we find that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version