Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1, Kalyan Versus M/s. Krishna Sheet Processors Pvt. Ltd.,

Addition u/s 68 - undisclosed cash credit - Held tht:- We do not find any strength in the allegation made by the AO. Allegations are baseless and without any supportive evidence. On the contrary, these two companies have paid share application money from their bank accounts through account payee cheque, therefore the transaction cannot be treated as bogus. Since the AO has not made any further enquiry, merely because of the false allegation, a genuine transaction cannot become non genuine transa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

IYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For the Appellant: Shri S.M. Bandi For the Respondent: Shri Asghar Zain O R D E R PER N.K. BILLAIYA, AM: These are cross appeals by the Revenue and the assessee against the very same order of the Ld. CIT(A)-1, Thane dt. 28.9.2012 pertaining to assessment year 2009-10. As common issues are involved, both these appeals were heard together and are disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 2. Facts of the case are that the assessee is a dealer i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

X ₹ 1100) is to various companies and remaining ₹ 59,40,000/- i.e. (5400 X 1100) is to family members of the Directors. The details of the share capital subscribed by the company are as under: S. No. Name Qty. Amount Introduced (in Rs) 1. M/s. Alliance Intermediateries & Network Pvt. Ltd., 5900 64,90,000 2. M/s. Mahasagar Securities Pvt. Ltd., 5900 64,90,000 3. M/s. Mihir Agencies Pvt. Ltd. 5000 55,00,000 4. M/s. Kaycee share Broking Pvt. Ltd. 5900 64,90,000 5. M/s. Pranik Shipp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the above companies. The assessee could file confirmations in respect of following companies: 1) M/s. Kaycee share Broking Pvt. Ltd. 2) M/s. Mihir Agencies Pvt. Ltd. 3) M/s. Alliance Intermediateries & Network Pvt. Ltd., 4) M/s. Mahasagar Securities Pvt. Ltd., 2.2. No confirmation was filed by the assessee. The assessee could file only profit and loss account and balance sheet of these companies for the financial year 2008-09. The AO observed that in their respective balance sheet, no inves .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/s. Mahasagar Securities Pvt. Ltd., and its group concerns were engaged in fraudulent billing activities and in the business of providing bogus speculation profit/loss, short term/long term capital gain/loss, commodities profit/loss on commodity trading (through MCX) and bogus share capital introduction. 2.3. The AO further observed that during the course of search, the sworn statement of Shri Mukesh Choksi was recorded in the office of DDIT who had confirmed the clandestine activity referred to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nik Shipping & Services Ltd., (6) M/s. Jasnil Finance & Trading Pvt. Ltd., (7) M/s. Nilpur Vanijya Pvt. Ltd (8) M/s. WAH Foods Pvt. Ltd (9) M/s. KKSS Builders Pvt. Ltd (10) M/s. Keystone Stock Finance Pvt. Ltd (11) M/s. Premier Soya Ltd (12) M/s. Indo Con Core Pvt. Ltd., 2.5. The AO treated the share application money from these companies as unexplained income u/s. 68 of the Act and made an addition of ₹ 9,60,30,000/-. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter before the Ld. CI .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Pvt. Ltd., and confirmed the addition respect of other six companies. 4. Aggrieved by this both Revenue and the assessee are in appeal before us. 5. First we will take up Revenue s appeal in ITA No. 546/M/2013. 6. We have heard the rival submissions and given a thoughtful consideration to the orders of the authorities below and with the assistance of the Ld. Counsel, we have considered the relevant documentary evidences brought on record and referred to before us. The undisputed facts are that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ustify the addition. It is also an undisputed fact that transactions with these companies have been done through account payee cheque, respective bank statement have been brought on record before us. Even if we consider the statement of Shri Mukesh Choksi recorded u/s. 132(4) of the Act and also subsequently u/s. 131 of the Act, we do not find any reference to the assessee company, nowhere Shri Mukesh Choksi has said that he has arranged share capital for the assessee company. Merely because Shr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alleged bogus shareholders, whose names are given to the AO, then the department is free to proceed to reopen their individual assessments in accordance with law, but it cannot be regarded as undisclosed income of the assessee company. 6.1. In respect of other two companies viz., (1)M/s. Premier Soya Ltd.,(2) M/s. Indo Con Core Pvt. Ltd., the AO at page-19 of his order has observed that on verification of the details submitted by the assessee it is seen that the money has been advanced by the as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eque, therefore the transaction cannot be treated as bogus. Since the AO has not made any further enquiry, merely because of the false allegation, a genuine transaction cannot become non genuine transaction. 6.3. The First Appellate Authority has considered the facts in the light of the provisions of Sec. 68 of the Act and have deleted the additions in respect of these six companies. On the basis of same documentary evidences brought on record before us, we do not find any reason to interfere wi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

WAH Foods Pvt. Ltd. 1,49,87,500/- 8. We have given a thoughtful consideration to the orders of the authorities below. The additions have been made by the AO in respect of the above named companies for the following reasons: i) Prior to issue of cheque to the assessee company these companies have received monies from their sister concerns and their sister concerns have deposited cash before giving cheque to these companies. ii) The Director of the Company did not attend the proceedings. All thes .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e AO confirmed the additions. The Ld. CIT(A) agreed with the AO that in place of Directors, Chartered Accountant of these companies have appeared who were not authorized to make any statement on behalf of these companies. 9. Before us, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee reiterated what has been submitted before the lower authorities. The ld. Counsel drew our attention to the relevant documents brought on record before us in the form of a paper book. Referring to order V Rule 1 of the Code of Civil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

plication money given by the respective companies. Therefore, the Revenue authorities have grossly erred in rejecting their submissions made during the remand proceedings. 10. The Ld. DR strongly supported the assessment order and the order of the Ld. CIT(A). 11. The undisputed fact is that the additions have been made only because the Directors did not appear before the AO but the companies were represented by their respective Chartered Accountants. This cannot be a reason to treat a genuine co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version