Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, LTU, Chennai Versus Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.

Levy of equal penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - Invokation of Section 80 ibid - Reversal of excess Cenvat credit availed along with interest under protest before issuance of SCN - Held that:- there is no suppression of facts with an intention to evade payment of duty, as the respondent has paid the service tax and interest by showing their Bonafides. Therefore, a reasonable cause is present to invoke Section 80 ibid and the penalty is waived of. - Decided against the revenue - Appeal No. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

audit by the Service Tax authorities. During the course of audit, it was noticed by the Revenue that excess CENVAT Credit was availed by the Respondent to the tune of ₹ 13,69,210/-. The Respondent had agreed to the aforesaid observation of the audit department and has reversed the CENVAT Credit availed along with interest under protest before issuance of Show cause notice. A show cause notice no. LTUC/147/2011- (ADC) dated 21.04.2011 was issued stating that there was willful suppression on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

suance of show cause notice and that the said fact has been recorded in the Show cause notice itself; that there was no suppression in the present case as the CENVAT Credit details were submitted to the authorities at the time of filing the refund claim. 3. The original adjudicating authority adjudicated the matter and passed the Order-in-Original No. LTUC/53/2012-ADC dated 6.2.2012 whereby the tax and interest paid under protest was appropriated and penalty equal to the tax due was levied. Bein .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

od Oceanics Pacific Ltd. Vs, CST Ahemdabad - 2013 (32) STR 756 (Tri.-Ahmd.) for waiver of penalty under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), the appellant-Revenue has preferred this appeal before Tribunal. 4. In the grounds of appeal, the Revenue has contended that the respondent-assessee had availed wrong CENVAT Credit on many occasions and that was not disclosed to the department either in their ST-3 returns or in any other for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Textile Processor - 2008 (231) ELT 3, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that any penalty otherwise imposable under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be avoided on the ground that the duty amount was paid by the assessee prior to issuance of show cause notice. 5. Shri K.P. Muralidharan, AC, Ld. A.R appearing for the Appellant-Revenue, re-iterated the grounds of appeal and stated that equal penalty ought to be levied in the present case. He also placed reliance on the ruling .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the facts of the case and that merely because an appeal has been preferred against the said ruling would not be a ground for appeal. He placed reliance on the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of Union Of India Vs Kamlakshi Finance Corporation Ltd. - 1991 (55) ELT 433 (SC) to support his argument. He also submitted that the Respondent is a large tax payer and the quantum of data handled by the Respondent was voluminous i.e. the mistake had happened in 132 occasions out of 9400 entries ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

guishable. He also submitted that several audits were conducted by the Appellant before and during the period of dispute and they were completely aware of all facts for the said period. He further submitted that it is an admitted fact that there was a mistake at the time of availment of credit however it was never the intention of the Respondent to wilfully suppress facts from the Department with an intention to evade payment of tax as all facts were made available to Department at the time of a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a handled by the Respondent, minor mistakes are bound to happen. In this regard, I find that the ruling of the CESTAT in the case of Canara Bank Vs CST Bangalore (supra) is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case. The relevant extract of the ruling is reproduced below: "6. Regarding imposition of penalty of INR 14,67,499/- (Rupees Fourteen Lakhs Sixty Seven Thousand Four Hundred and Ninety Nine only) imposed under Rule 15(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules for the above wrongly taken ce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

kes do take place for which the appellant is not to be punished by imposing the penalties. The appellant has also cited in defense the Honble Supreme Courts decision in the case of Hindustan Steel Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa [1978 (2) E.L.T. (J159) (SC)] saying that in case of unintentional lapse imposition of penalty is not justified. 7. Considering the facts on record and the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Steel Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa (supra) and the provisions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ninety Nine only) is not justified. The Hon ble Supreme Court inter alia has held as below: An order imposing penalty for failure to carry out a statutory obligation is the result of a quasi-criminal proceeding, and penalty will not ordinarily be imposed unless the party obliged either acted deliberately in defiance of law or was guilty of conduct contumacious or dishonest, or acted in conscious disregard of its obligation. Penalty will not also be imposed merely because it is lawful to do so. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

act in the manner prescribed by the statute. Those in charge of the affairs of the Company in failing to register the Company as a dealer acted in the honest and genuine belief that the Company was not a dealer. Granting that they erred, no case for imposing penalty was made out. The Revenue has alleged that there was wilful suppression in the present case as they had detected that wrong availment of credit only during the course of audit conducted by them. In this regard, I find that the rulin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ance of show cause notice and they have borne the incidence of tax on their shoulders, is sufficient evidence to show that the reasons for not paying the service tax by the assessee were the technical/ legal reasons rather than wilful suppression with an intent to evade payment of service tax . From the above, we find that besides our own observations finding of the Commissioner with which we agree, support the view that provisions of Section 80 are required to be invoked for waiving penalty imp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a judicial pronouncement unless its operation has been suspended by a competent Court. Based on the above, I am of the view that there is no suppression in the present case, as contended by the Appellant, as the Respondent has paid the service tax and interest by showing their Bonafides. The Appellant has relied on the ruling of the Madras High Court in the case of Dhandayuthapani Canteen (supra) wherein it was held that penalty is payable even though service tax and interest has been paid prio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version