Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax-7 (2) , Mumbai Versus M/s Siyaram Silk Mills Ltd.

Reduction of deduction u/s 80IB - whether CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in not appreciating that where income from exempted unit in respect of eligible business was higher than the normal profit in case of existing units, a burden of proof of very high order was cast on assessee to prove correctness of such profit and assesee failed to discharge this onus? - Held that:- The facts of the year under consideration are identical to those of earlier years. By following findings of earlier year .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

all units by AO was on assumption basis only without pointing out any defect, error in the books of accounts of all units maintained separately. Without quoting any example, on assumption basis, the AO held that the transactions were not at arm's length between the associate enterprises. The AO has not explained as to how he was not satisfied about the correctness or completeness of the accounts of the appellant. The AO has also not given any finding that the method of accounting has not been re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he above facts and circumstances and also considering that the facts of the year under consideration are identical to those of earlier years, by following the appeal orders of earlier years, it is held that the AO was not justified in applying the net profit ratio of 4.57% to determine the profits of units eligible for deduction u / s 80-IB of the Act. The AO's action of reducing the appellant's claim of deduction u /s 80-18 is therefore, disapproved. - Decided in favour of assessee - I.T.A. No. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent years hence we reproduce as lead grounds of appeal for A.Y. 2010-11 bearing ITA No. 5433/Mum/2013 as under: (i) The Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the reduction of deduction u/s 80IB as worked out by the Assessing officer without properly appreciating the factual and legal matrix as clearly brought out by the Assessing Officer in the Assessment Order. (ii) The Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in not appreciating the fact that net profit from 80IB units w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es to be set aside. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee engaged in the business of manufacture and marketing of fabrics, value added yarn, readymade garments and furnishing fabrics. The assessee has its manufacturing facilities at Tarapur, Silvassa, Daman and also markets its readymade Garments under the brand like Oexemberg, MSD and J Hampstead. During the year under consideration the assessee has claimed deduction u/s 80IB to extent of ₹ 6,26,68,195/- and during the cour .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g the replies, and the information gather during the course of assessment proceeding. The AO passed order of assessment and made disallowances in quantum of 80IB deduction and also made certain disallowances out of the claim of expenses and depreciation and made addition on account of difference between opening stock and closing stock. 4. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. 5. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fferent manufacturing divisions and the divisions had different units. The profit earned form the some of the divisions/units were entitled for deduction u/s 80-IB of the act. In the year under consideration, the appellant had claimed deduction u/s 80-IB of the act at ₹ 6,26,68,195/- on profits earned from eligible units. In earlier years also, the appellant was having eligible units entitled for deduction u/s 80IB of the Act on profits of eligible units. In assessment orders of earlier ye .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thereby reworked out the profits of all units, allocating expenses to all units and thereby reworked out the profits of the 80-IB eligible units. By applying a fixed percentage of profit, the AO therefore, reduced the appellant's claim of deduction u/s 80-IB of the Act in the assessment order of earlier years. On appeal filed by appellant for AY 2007-08,2008-09 & 2009-10, my predecessors i.e. CIT (A) have not approved AO's action of (i) applying fixed percentage of profit to all eli .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssor has made a detailed discussion in respect of appellant's different units, profits of eligible/non-eligible units, overall percentage of net profit of business and percentage of high profit shown in 80-IB units, allocation of major expenses to different units, rejection of book result by the AO. After making a detailed discussion, my predecessor in appeal order of AY 2009-10 held that "The facts of the case under consideration is identical to the preceding year i.e. AY 2007-08 and 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ions (manufacturing similar products/activities) and not with other units (manufacturing different products/carrying different activities) and by no stretch of imagination with the overall average profit of the whole company. My predecessor held that the AO erred in consolidating the overall profitability of all units together and applying average profit of whole company to all units without any adverse material on record is not maintainable. My predecessor further held that separate books of ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ores to ₹ 1.39 crores by the AO was therefore, deleted by my predecessor in appeal order for A Y 2009-10. The facts of the year under consideration are identical to those of earlier years. By following findings of earlier years' assessment order, in the year under consideration also the AO has reallocated the expenses to all units and thereby recalculating the profits of all units by applying the net profit rate of 4.57% to all units. Such net profit rate of 4.57% was percentage of pro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

held that the transactions were not at arm's length between the associate enterprises. The AO has not explained as to how he was not satisfied about the correctness or completeness of the accounts of the appellant. The AO has also not given any finding that the method of accounting has not been regularly followed by the appellant. Since the AO did not point out any defect in the books of accounts, the AO was not justified in rejecting appellant's books of accounts by invoking provisions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version