Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Sanjay Thul Versus CPIO, C.B.E. & C.

2015 (7) TMI 1088 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

RTI application - Held that:- The Commission is of the considered view that the appellant has been deprived by the respondents deliberately from having the benefits of the RTI Act 2005, even after lapse of more than five months period. Thus, the resp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n feels that it would be appropriate and even justified to allow the appellant’s second appeal in toto instead of remanding back to learned FAA for disposal of FA which is even more time consuming. Therefore, it is allowed in toto.

Thus th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder intimation to this Commission. If needed Section 5(4) of the RTI Act, 2005 be also invoked in the matter. - File No. CIC/KY/A/2015/000442 - Dated:- 6-7-2015 - Shri M.A. Khan Yusufi, Information Commissioner Shri Sanjay Thul, the Appellant. Shri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed information not provided. IV. First Appellate Authority (FAA), Order is not on record. V. Grounds for the Second Appeal filed on 29-4-2015, are contained in the Memorandum of Appeal. Hearing Appellant as well as respondent appeared before the Comm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to furnish any response to the appellant. Being aggrieved with the aforesaid PIO s inaction, appellant filed his FA on NIL before FAA, who could not take up the same for its disposal for the reasons best known to him. Hence, a second appeal before t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ur-Rehman, Under Secretary seems to be not in a position to respond the query posed by the Commission. 3. The Commission again posed a query to him, as to whether appellant s FA dated NIL filed before the learned FAA was disposed of or still pen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

icers of CBEC have been acting at their whims and fancies and not in accordance with the provisions of law. Therefore, it is against the very spirit of the RTI Act, 2005 and also against the service rules and regulations. 4. The Commission heard .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m of second appeal. 5. The Commission is of the considered view that the appellant has been deprived by the respondents deliberately from having the benefits of the RTI Act 2005, even after lapse of more than five months period. Thus, the respon .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version