Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Smt. Bela Goyal Versus The ACIT, Circle-4, Jaipur.

2016 (5) TMI 411 - ITAT JAIPUR

Interest incurred on acquisition of land for expansion of business - allowability of expenses - It has not been disputed that the assessee had her own capital to the extent of ₹ 3.04 crores. The assessee’s claim that the land was acquired for business purposes and shown as business asset in the Balance Sheet has not been disputed and only on assumption it has been held that it is not business purposes. In our considered view, such type of assumption cannot be sustained when in books of acc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erest free funds more than ₹ 3.04 crores which is more than the investment in question. Even alternatively the assessee’s claim for interest and finance charges cannot be disallowed. - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. 47/JP/2014 - Dated:- 30-3-2016 - SHRI R.P. TOLANI, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM For The Assessee : Shri Manish Agarwal, (C.A.) For The Revenue : Shri Raj Mehra, (Jddl.CIT) ORDER PER SHRI R.P. TOLANI, J.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment made in purchase of land is not yielding income to the assessee without appreciating the fact that the land was purchased for business purpose for construction of factory and godown and further without establishing the nexus between borrowed funds and investment by the assessee, therefore disallowance so sustained deserves to be deleted. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ld. CIT (A) has grossly erred in sustaining the disallowance of brokerage on finance made by the l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd nos. 2 & 3 are inter-connected. Assessee purchased a piece of land claiming to be for the purpose of construction of a factory building and godown thereon for the purpose of her business. The said land was purchased for ₹ 1,15,00,000/- and after including cost towards registration charges etc. the total value debited in the books of account was of ₹ 1,25,29,580/-. During the year under appeal, the assessee has paid interest of ₹ 75,12,338/- on the borrowed funds as shown .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t by grossly ignoring the fact that the same was paid on the gross value of borrowed funds and not on the interest paid. The ld. CIT (A) though uphold the disallowance, however, restricted the same to the period from the date of purchases of land to the end of the financial year and interest rate is reduced from 18% to average rate of interest paid on borrowed funds. 4. Aggrieved, the assessee is before us. 4.1. The ld. A/R for the assessee contends that the allegation of ld.AO that the borrowed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the year at ₹ 1,93,28,641/- which is apparent from the copy of Balance Sheet, copy placed on record. As per settled law, the AO was obliged to establish the nexus between the borrowed funds and the payment of consideration for purchase of land. However, the ld. AO had miserably failed to prove any sort of nexus between borrowed funds and the purchase of said land, especially when the assessee was having at her disposal sufficient amount of interest free funds to meet out the payment of co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ation of funds as under :- Source Balance as on 31.3.2009 Balance as at 31.3.2010 Application Balance as at 31.3.2009 Balance as at 31.3.2010. Capital 3,04,03,271 4,42,43,829 Fixed Assets 56,37,108 1,84,71,335 Capital 5,22,16,355 8,70,48,664 Deposits 10,79,923 10,71,604 Unsecured Loans 3,68,59,721 5,68,84,875 Current Assets 11,07,76,580 17,64,17,110 Current Liabilities 45,75,266 3,30,67,613 VAT, statutory and other business advances 65,64,104 2,52,85,033 Besides this, the ld. A/R submitted that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is clearly established that the borrowed funds are not applied in the acquisition of the land in question. The ld. A/R contended that the AO as well as ld. CIT (A) have failed to consider this aspect before arriving at the conclusion that borrowed funds were used for purchase of new commercial land. In support of his contention, the ld. A/R relied on the following judgments :- Munjal Sales Corporation vs. CIT & Others 298 ITR 298 (SC) CIT vs. Hotel Savera 239 ITR 795 (Mad.) CIT vs. Radico Kh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ness purposes. The term business purpose employed in section 36(1)(iii) has a wide ranging meaning and is not restricted to the means of yielding immediate and direct income and user of the godown is always for the business purposes. Therefore, he prayed that the addition of ₹ 22,55,324/- may please be deleted. 4.2. On the other hand, the ld. D/R supported the orders of the lower authorities. 4.3. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. It has not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ance should be disallowed. The ld. Counsel for the assessee on the other hand contends that the investment in question has been shown in the assessee s balance sheet pertaining to its business towards acquisition of a business asset. There was no other use for the assessee to purchase such land. The assessee is in the business of iron and steel and to have future plan for expansion of business cannot be assumed to be a non business activity. Therefore, there is no justification in the inference .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version