Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Income-tax Officer, Ward-I (1) , D.P. Thottam, Muthialpet Versus Late K. Muthukaruppan Pondicherry

Penalty passed u/s.271D and 271E - borrowing the money in cash - Held that:- For the asst. year 2008-09, the assessee borrowed ₹ 20 lakhs and deposited by the assessee in bank account No.32 with UCO Bank. Thereafter the amount was transferred to M/s. ICICI Bank account. Similarly for the asst. year 2009-10, the assessee borrowed ₹ 20 lakhs and deposited with UCO Bank and M/s. ICICI Bank. For the asst year 2010-11 also, the assessee borrowed ₹ 20 lakhs in cash and deposited by h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the assessee, if the assessee show reasonable cause for borrowing the money in cash.

This is the case, where the assessee is having bank account, repeatedly borrowing the money in cash with gross violation of the Act. The plea of the ld. AR is that the creditors are genuine and confirmed by the parties and there was no revenue loss to the Department. Had it been, the creditors are not genuine, the AO would have invoked the provisions of sec.68 of the Act. The question of revenue los .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has not placed any evidence to establish that there was bank balance on the date of borrowing. Thus we are inclined to reverse the order of the CIT(Appeals) in deleting the penalty and confirming the penalty levied u/s.271D of the Act for all these assessment years. - Decided against assessee - ITA Nos. 1959 to 1964/Mds/2013 - Dated:- 22-4-2016 - SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER For The Appellant by : Ms. Vijaya Prabha, JCIT For The Respond .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct was conducted in the business premises of Shri A. Kannan, Prop. of Vadamalayan Finance on 8.10.2011 by Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(1), Puducherry. M/s. Vadamalayan Finance gave money to different persons after deducting interest for 10 months. The amount is divided into 10 monthly instalments. Once the repayment of 10 monthly instalments are over, again the same person took further loan. He charged interest on the loan at 1% per month. The whole transaction was done by cash only i.e. no cheque .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt: ₹ 2 lakhs A.Y. 2007-08 Cash loan: 06.12.2006 20 lakhs Cash repayment: ₹ 24 lakhs A.Y. 2008-09 Cash loan: 06.10.2007 20 lakhs Cash repayment: ₹ 24 lakhs A.Y. 2009-10 Cash loan: 07.08.2008 20 lakhs Cash repayment: ₹ 24 lakhs A.Y. 2010-11 Cash loan: 06.06.2009 20 lakhs Cash repayment: ₹ 24 lakhs A.Y. 2011-12 Cash loan: 07.04.2010 20 lakhs Cash repayment: ₹ 24 lakhs 19.08.2010 50 lakhs The information collected at the time of survey action was passed on to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t penal proceedings relates to the transactions made by Late Sri K.Muthukaruppan who had passed away on 16.2.2012 and wanted certain time to furnish required information. Thereafter, the assessee complied with the penal proceedings before the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Puducherry and filed various details. Not satisfied with the submissions of the assessee, Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Puducherry Range, Puducherry passed penalty orders u/s 271D & 271E of the IT Act, 1961 in the c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

IT(Appeals) dated 28.8.2013 is having two parts. One is levy of penalty u/s.271D and another u/s.271E of the Act. The ld. AR further submitted that in that order, the CIT(Appeals) confirmed the penalty u/s.271E and deleted the penalty u/s.271D of the Act. 4. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. The ld. AR submitted that similar issue came for consideration before the Tribunal in assessee s own case in ITA Nos.1820 to 1825/Mds/2013. The Tribunal vide order dated 31.1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

earned Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, appearing for the Revenue. 16. It is to be seen that the particulars of loans taken by the assessees and repayments of loans made by the assessees, were collected in the course of survey conducted in the premises of Shri A. Kannan, who is carrying on the business of money lending under the name and style of Vadamalayan Finance . It is seen from the records, as observed by the Assessing Officer, that Shri A. Kannan had no licence to carry on money lending .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the transactions must be in cash as insisted by Shri A. Kannan. That acts as a reasonable cause in the case of these assessees regarding acceptance and repayment of loans to Shri A. Kannan, who is the proprietor of M/s Vadamalayan Finance. 17. While considering the circumstances leading to accepting the loans in cash, and while deleting the penalty levied on assessees under Section 271D, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) might have considered this circumstance also while coming to a con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

created by the mode of money lending business carried on by Shri A. Kannan. 19. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), while deleting the penalty levied under Section 271D, has appreciated the circumstance which compelled the assessees transaction in cash; but he has somehow failed to take the same yardstick in appreciating the circumstances in which the assessees were compelled to make the repayments of loans in cash. 20. The Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. Stat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

imposed for failure to perform a statutory obligation is a matter of discretion of the authority to be exercised judicially and on a consideration of all the relevant circumstances. 21. When we examine the facts and circumstances of the cases placed before us, we find that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who has justifiably deleted the penalty levied under Section 271D, has acted against the principle declared by Hon ble Supreme Court in the above judgment of Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. St .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, unaccounted money was unearthed and they would usually give the explanation that he had borrowed or received deposits from his relatives or friends that it is easy for the so-called lender also to manipulate his records later to suit the plea of the taxpayer. The Hon ble Apex Court observed that the main object of Section 269SS was to curb this menace. 23. In the present case, no adverse circumstances existed against these assessees as apprehended by Hon ble Supreme Court in the above decision .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssed to income-tax. The identity of the parties are beyond doubt. The factum of loan and repayments are beyond doubt. The genuineness of the transactions is also not in doubt. It is also established by the assessees that there existed similar emergency for repaying the loan in cash, as the emergency which prompted them to take loans in cash. Therefore, this is a case where there is a reasonable cause for the assessees to repay the loans in cash. In such circumstances, it is to be seen that the v .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Tribunal is only passing remarks and it cannot be said it is finding on the issue before us. In the present case, there was a survey u/s.133A of the Act conducted at the business premises of Sri A. Kannan, Prop. Of Vadamalayan Finance on 8.10.2011 by the Income-tax Officer, Ward-I(1), Puducherry. During the course of survey it was found that Sri Kannan was having money lending business and he chose to give loans to only selected group of persons. He gave money to persons after taking intere .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ash loan: 11.12.2005 20 lakhs Cash repayment: ₹ 2 lakhs A.Y. 2007-08 Cash loan: 06.12.2006 20 lakhs Cash repayment: ₹ 24 lakhs A.Y. 2008-09 Cash loan: 06.10.2007 20 lakhs Cash repayment: ₹ 24 lakhs A.Y. 2009-10 Cash loan: 07.08.2008 20 lakhs Cash repayment: ₹ 24 lakhs A.Y. 2010-11 Cash loan: 06.06.2009 20 lakhs Cash repayment: ₹ 24 lakhs A.Y. 2011-12 Cash loan: 07.04.2010 20 lakhs Cash repayment: ₹ 24 lakhs 19.08.2010 50 lakhs 5.1 The assessee has taken a plea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

from same persons in cash. It is also on record that the assessee is having bank account as seen in the asst. year 2006-07, the assessee borrowed ₹ 20 lakhs and deposited in bank account No.781 with UCO Bank. Thereafter, the said amount was transferred to M/s. New India Palmer Foods Pvt. Ltd. In the asst. year 2007-08, the assessee borrowed ₹ 20 lakhs and deposited in bank account No.32 with UCO Bank. This is the bank account of Muthu Silk House. Thereafter the amount was transferred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s. SBI. For the asst. year 2001-12, the assessee borrowed ₹ 20 lakhs and ₹ 50 lakhs and deposited in the account of SBI. Though the assessee is having bank account, he borrowed the money in cash and later deposited the same in the bank accounts. The ld. AR pleaded that due to urgency and compulsion, money was repeatedly borrowed in cash. The assessee has not explained the nature of urgency or compulsion. The provisions of sec.273B of the Act comes to the rescue of the assessee, if th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r the levy of penalty u/s.271D of the Act. The provisions of sec.269SS of the Act is constitutionally valid in view of the judgment of the High Court in the case of ADIT v. Kum A.B.Shanthi (255 ITR 258), wherein it was observed as under : Section 269SS of the Income-tax Act, 1961, prescribing the mode of taking or accepting certain loans or deposits, is not discriminatory and is not violative of article 14 of the Constitution of India ; nor was it enacted by Parliament without legislative compet .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, he shall not escape by giving false explanation for the same. During search and seizures, unaccounted money is unearthed and the taxpayer would usually give the explanation that he had borrowed or received deposits from his relatives or friends and it is easy for the so-called lender also to manipulate his records to suit the plea of the taxpayer. The main object of section 269SS was to curb this menace of making false entries in the account books and later giving an explanation for the same. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n given in the Lists in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution should not be construed in a narrow or pedantic way. If any Legislature makes an ancillary or subsidiary provision which incidentally transgresses its jurisdiction for achieving the object of such legislation, it would be a valid piece of legislation. The entries in a legislative list should be given their fullest meaning and widest amplitude and be held to extend to all ancillary and subsidiary matters which can fairly and reasona .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ainly be within the competence of Parliament. When a provision in a statute is challenged on the ground of colourable legislation, what has to be proved to the satisfaction of the court is that though the statute ostensibly is within the legislative competence of the Legislature in question, in substance and in reality, it covers a field which is outside its legislative competence. 5.3 Further, business exigencies shall be supported by evidence. The assessee has not brought on record any materia .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

T (375 ITR 243), wherein it was held, dismissing the appeals : (i) that the entire transactions took place in Pondicherry, a major city and there was no reason why the assessee should not have repaid the amount by cheque or demand draft through the bank, assuming he had received the loan in cash. The entire transaction between the assessee, a financier and the financier who was also financing a large number of persons, was apparently to evade tax, which came to light after a survey was conducted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. The assessee on his part had repeatedly, for every assessment year, conducted the business in the same manner receiving and repaying the loan amount in cash. Hence, these could not be called bona fide transactions and there was no reasonable cause. The conduct of the parties is important to exercise the discretion under section 273B . As the assessee had not passed the test of reasonable cause showing his bona fides, the provisions of section 273B were not attracted, especially since no explan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Manpower Service provider

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer

Notification: Exempts inter-state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 09/2017-IT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 08/2017-IT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-CT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017-CT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services.

News: Tax on fuel more important for a dry state like Gujarat

Highlight: For an ayurvedic medicine to be classified under Chapter 30 has to pass the test whether it is for cure of any disease. If the same is only meant for care, then such product would not fall under medicament.

Highlight: Demand of interest - the period of limitation that applies to a claim for the principal amount should also apply to the claim of interest thereon.

Highlight: Government issues new notifications under CGST, IGST and UTGST to grant fresh exemptions in respect of certain supplies.

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017

Forum: Construction of single unit bungalow

Article: SIMPLIFIED E-WAY BILL UNDER GST

Article: SERVICES UNDER REVERSE CHARGE UNDER GST REGIME

Highlight: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. reg. - Circular

Highlight: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 - Public Notice

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Circular: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20

Notification: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version