GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (5) TMI 1065 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (5) TMI 1065 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2016 (333) E.L.T. 115 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Classification - Whether the product “Super Micro Binder 20” would be appropriately classified under Chapter Heading 3906 or 3911 and whether product “Triton AE” is correctly classifiable under Heading 3911 as claimed by the appellant or 3906 as claimed by the Revenue - Held that:- it is found that the product which answers to the description of Acquous Polymer in primary form are covered under heading 3906. Also the Dy. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

6 are nothing but acrylic monomer linked up by a process called polymerization.

The Tribunal has held in respect of similar products in the appellant's own case reported in [2001 (4) TMI 358 - CEGAT, MUMBAI], that similar product containing copolymer resins were held merit classification under chapter Heading 3906.90. The said order was affirmed by the Apex Court Therefore, we do not find any difference in the products in question before us as against the product which is classified u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

B - Dated:- 20-10-2015 - Shri M.V. Ravindran, Member (J) and C.J. Mathew, Member (T) Shri S.V. Apte, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri N.N. Prabhudesai, Supdt. (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - These appeals are directed against Order-in-Appeal No. BR/45/Th-I/2005, dated 31-3-2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai-IV. 2. The relevant facts that arise for consideration are that the appellant herein was engaged in manufact .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Chief Chemist s report was relied upon by the lower authorities to hold against the appellant s classification. The appellant contested the matter before the adjudicating authority on merits as well as the jurisdiction. The adjudicating authority after following the due process of law confirmed the demand and also imposed penalties. Aggrieved by the said order, an appeal was preferred before the first appellate authority, who upheld the Order-in-Original. 2.1 In Appeal No. E/2388/2005, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts that the appellant s product is classifiable under 3906 and not under 3911 in the case of Indofil Super Micro Binder. He would submit that they have been classifying this product under this Chapter Heading and claiming the benefit of Sr. No. 05 of Notification No. 14/92-C.E. as the said heading talks about reduced rate of duty on Acrylic Monomer and copolymer resin emulsions based on acrylic and/or vinyl monomers. 3.1 He would further draw our attention to the Chapter Heading 3906 and 39 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

T. A185 (S.C.). 3.2 As regards the classification of the product Triton AE under Heading 3906, he leaves it to the Bench after bringing to our notice the factual position in the case. 4. Learned AR appearing for the Revenue, on the other hand would draw our attention to the Chapter sub-heading No. 3911. It is his submission that chapter sub-heading 3911 talks about the resins and other products specified in Note 3 to this Chapter, not elsewhere specified or included, in primary forms. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the product Super Micro Binder 20 would be appropriately classified under Chapter Heading 3906 or 3911 and whether product Triton AE is correctly classifiable under Heading 3911 as claimed by the appellant or 3906 as claimed by the Revenue. 5.2 As regards the product Triton AE, the appellant s Counsel fairly concedes that the said product would fall under Chapter Heading No. 3906 but prays that all the benefits eligible under exemption Notification No. 14/92-C.E., to this chapter heading be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e find that the competing entries are as under : - Chapter No. Description of goods 3906 Acrylic Polymers in primary forms - Ploy (methyl methacrylate) : 3906 10 10 - Binders for pigments or inks Kg. 12.5% 3906 10 90 - Other Kg. 12.5% 3906 90 - Other: 3906 90 10 - Acrylic resins Kg. 12.5% 3906 90 20 - Polyacrylate moulding powder Kg. 12.5% 3906 90 30 - Copolymers of acrylonitrile Kg. 12.5% 3906 90 90 - Other .... Kg. 12.5% 3911 Petroleum resins, Coumarone-indene resins, Polyterpenes, Polysulphid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ould fall under 3906. Revenue s claim is sought to be supported by the learned AR as well as by the lower authorities on the ground that the Dy. Chief Chemist s report is indicating the product as resin. We reproduce the said portion of the Dy. Chief Chemist s report, which is as under : - The same is in the form of white liquid. It is an Acqueous Synthetic Resin Emulsion Based on Acrylic Monomers. 5.4 We do not find any merits in the claim of the Revenue that the product merits classificat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd that the product which answers to the description of Acquous Polymer in primary form are covered under said heading. As we have also reproduced the Dy. Chief Chemist s report hereinabove, which categorically states that the product Super Micro Binder 20 is a resin based on Acrylic Monomers. If the product of the appellant is based on Acrylic Monomers, in our view the product merits classification under 3906.90, as there is technically no difference in respect of acrylic monomer or acrylic pol .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dgment needs to be reproduced, which we do so. The question for consideration in this appeal is whether the copolymer composed predominantly of acrylic and partly of styrene monomer is entitled to the benefit of exemption in entry 5 to the Table to Notification 14/92. The entry exempts from duty homopolymer and copolymer resin emulsion based on acrylic and/or vinyl monomer classifiable in heading 3905.10, 3905.90 or 3906.90 of the Central Excise Tariff. The goods were held not be entitled to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t on the basis of predominance the copolymer had classified as acrylic under heading 3906.90. 3. Heading 3905 is for polymer of vinyl acetate and heading 3906 is for acrylic polymers. For the goods to get the benefit of the exemption, they should not only comply with the description in the second column of the Table to the notification; they must also be classifiable under any of the three headings mentioned in the column 1 of the Table. 4. In its judgement in GSFC. v. C.C.E. - 1997 (9 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version