TMI Blog2015 (11) TMI 1531X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... echnical) For the Appellants: Shri S K Sarwal, Advocate For the Respondent: Shri Amresh Jain, AR Per R K Singh : Stay application along with appeal has been filed against order-in-original dated 31.5.13, in terms of which service tax of Rs. 9,27,14,535/- in respect of show cause notice dated 17.8.2010 and Rs. 5,50,36,386/- in respect of show cause notice dated 9.8.2012 have been confirmed al ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t on the ground of non-inclusion of free supply material in the value of taxable service, the issue is covered in the appellants favour vide CESTAT-Larger Bench in the case of M/s. Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd. (supra). As regards the service provided to the so called charitable organization in the form of constructing buildings for Amity School, Amity University and Amity Engineering College at vari ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... read with Section 83 of Finance Act, 1994. Accordingly, we order pre-deposit of Rs. 1,75,00,000/- (Rupees One crore seventy five lakh only) within 8 weeks. Compliance is to be reported by 20.1.2016. Subject to such compliance, recovery of the remaining adjudicating liability is stayed during pendency of the appeal. In case of default, the appeal stall stand dismissed for failure of pre-deposit. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|