Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri. S.S.N. Ravi, C/o. K.G. Raghunath Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

2016 (5) TMI 1144 - ITAT CHENNAI

Reopening of assessment - salary income - addition on repayment of sign on bonus back - whether the provision of Act permit deduction were the assessee voluntarily resigned from Barclays Bank and joined Deutsche Bank violating the pre-conditions of employment to stay with Barclays Bank for a period of one year? - Held that:- The assessee has received the amount during his employment and there exists employer and employee relationship and sign-inbonus cannot treated as capital receipt. We found o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

usal of provisions of Sec. 17(1) of the Act, there are no explanation were assessee should reduce refund of sign-on-bonus. Considering the apparent facts, terms of employment, characteristic of sign on bonus and the service certificate of Barclays Bank were assessee has voluntarily left the service. We are of the opinion that ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has examined the issue in detail based on the observations of the Assessing Officer and the provisions of law. Therefore, we are no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

peals)-IV, Chennai in ITA No.809/13-14, dt 0310.2014 for the assessment year 2008-2009 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.147 and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as the Act ). 2. The assessee has raised only one substantive ground as under:- To direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made of 25,00,000/- in the reassessment, on repayment of sign on bonus back to M/s. Barclays Bank, as this receipt does not constitute income. 3. The Brief facts of the case that assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

,00,000/- in the return of income. Further notice u/s.148 of the Act was issued and in compliance to notice, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee filed return of income on 19.07.2011 and appeared in hearing proceedings from time to time and submitted information for verification. The assessee is a employee of Barclays Bank during the financial year 2007-08 from 01.04.2007 to 31.10.2007 and received salary income of ₹ 13,46,943/- after resignation of service joined Deutsche Ban .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

refund the sign-on-bonus. Considering the facts, the assessee has left Barclays Bank and joined Deutsche Bank and refunded the amount of ₹ 25,00,000/- as acknowledged by Barclays Bank on 06.11.2007. The assessee filed return of income for assessment year 2007-08 and offered sign-on-bonus for taxation since the assessee has refunded an amount of ₹ 25,00,000/- on 06.11.2007 which falls in the financial year 2007-2008 relevant to assessment year 2008-09 he has reduced ₹ 25,00,000 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome Tax (Appeals). 4. In the hearing proceedings, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee argued on the grounds and submitted proofs pertaining to sign-on-bonus. The ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) considered written submissions on facts and interpretation of laws and concurred with findings of the Assessing Officer and dismissed the appeal observed at 18 of the order as under:- 18. In view of the above discussion, I find no infirmity in the action of the Assessing Officer in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an appeal before Tribunal. 5. Before us, the ld. Authorised Representative vehemently argued and substantiated with documentary evidence. The only disputed issue being deletion of addition of ₹ 25,00,000/- by the ld. Assessing Officer, were the said amount was repaid back to Barclays Bank which fall in current financial year. The ld. Authorised Representative filed paper book, written submissions explaining the circumstances of employment, taxability of income and highlightened on the fin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he grounds of the appeal. 7. We heard the rival submissions, perused the material on record and judicial decisions cited. The ld. Authorised Representative only disputed issue being sign-on-bonus should be allowed as deduction from the gross salary since it was repaid and offered to tax in assessment year 2007-08. The issue revolved around whether the provision of Act permit deduction were the assessee voluntarily resigned from Barclays Bank and joined Deutsche Bank violating the pre-conditions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version