Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Detect Electronics Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad

2016 (6) TMI 198 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Availing Cenvat Credit while availing benefit of abatement notification - services of erection, commissioning or installation service - period 2006-07 to 2008-09 by availing benefit of Notification No. 1/2006-ST dated 01.03.2006 - appellant had not satisfied the condition of Notification No. 1/2006-ST, in as much they claim abatement of 67% of the taxable value despite availing the CENVAT credit on the few input and inputs services. - Held that:- the appellant had reversed that entire CENVAT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Judicial) And Mr. C.J. Mathew, Member (Technical) For the Appellant : Shri H.S. Shirsat, Consultant For the Respondent : Shri P. Vinitha Sekhar, Dy. Commr. (A.R.) ORDER Per M. V. Ravindran This appeal is filed by the appellant against Order-in-Original No. 14/ST/Commr./2011 dated 17.03.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Aurangabad. 2. The issue involved in this case is regarding the demand of differential Service Tax liability from the appellant. The ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

confirm the Service Tax liability along with interest and also imposed penalties. 3. Learned Consultant would submit that they have reversed the entire amount of the CENVAT credit availing during the period; hence they are eligible under Notification No. 1/2006-ST for this proposition. They relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs Vs. Precot Meridian Ltd. 2015 (325) ELT 234 (S.C.). 4. Learned Departmental Representative whi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

46 SC CX and on the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Collector of Customs (Preventive), Amritsar Vs. Malwa Industries Limited 2009 TIOL 17 SC CX. 5. On considering the submissions made by both sides, we find that the issue involved in this case is in a narrow compass. The appellant availed the benefit of Notification No. 01/2006-ST on discharge of Service Tax liability after availing the abatement of 67% but it is denied on the ground that he had availed the CENVAT credit o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tification No. 5/99-C.E., dated 28-2-1999 is available subject to certain conditions and one of the conditions is that the assessee had not taken any credit under Rule 57A or Rule 57B or Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, in the process of dyeing, printing, bleaching or mercerising in the manufacture of dyed, printed, bleached or mercerised yarn. 2. As mentioned above, this Notification was issued on 28-2-1999. The product of the respondent is covered by the description of goods at Seri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version