TMI Blog2016 (6) TMI 363X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hanna, DR ORDER Per Ashok Jindal The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order demanding Rs. 19,21,131/- along with interest on account of erroneously sanctioned refund to the appellant. 2. The facts of the case are that the show cause notice dated 26.04.2004 was issued to the appellant to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism for the period 16.11.1997-02.06.1998 under goods t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... before this Tribunal and also sanctioned the refund claim to the appellant to the tune of Rs. 19,21,131/-. Later on a show cause notice was issued on 05.01.2007 on account of erroneously amount refunded to the appellant. During the pendency of the show cause notice, the appeal filed by the Revenue before this Tribunal against the order of Ld. Commissioner (A) dated 28.09.2005 this Tribunal set asi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|