New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (6) TMI 465 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

2016 (6) TMI 465 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD - 2016 (336) E.L.T. 529 (Tri. - All.) - Clandestine removal of goods - shortages in the finished goods - Seeking cross-examination of witnesses who allegedly maintained the log books Held that:- non-examination of the concerned person, whose statements have been relied upon is in violation of Section 9D of the Act, which provides that where any statements are to be relied upon of any person, in any proceedings under the Act, then such person must be examined .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

shall also offer his witnesses for cross-examination . The appellant shall be provided inspection of documents either relied upon and/or not relied upon, a copy of which, if they have not been given earlier shall be provided. Thereafter, the appellants, if they so desire, can file supplementary reply to the show-cause notice and after hearing the parties, the adjudication order shall be recorded by the authority. Appeal allowed by way of remand - MAs-70041-70044/15, Ex. Appeal Nos.3325-3328/20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Final Order dated 15.09.2011. 2. This Tribunal found that the appellant needs to be given adequate opportunity of hearing and accordingly, remanded the matter with a direction to the Appellant Company to make further deposit of ₹ 20.00 lakhs within four weeks and produce challan before the adjudicating authority and seek opportunity of hearing. It was also observed that the appellants will be entitled to inspect the copy of documents and the relied upon documents and also take the copies a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ification of the stock of the finished goods and cenvatable inputs, excess stock of 17.13 MT of un-coated kraft paper standard, was found and the shortages of 12.98 MT of un-coated kraft paper grade II was found. It was further found that the assessee Company was not maintaining any stock register of raw materials/cenvatable inputs regarding purchase, consumption or any balances. Physical stock of cenvatable inputs could not be co-related with any book balance, hence, the entire stock of cenvata .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

paper received and net quantity of waste paper was entered into the raw material account, after making deductions for items, like, Kachra, mud and other unusable material present in the lot. The appellant stated that the heads of deduction from waste paper received in the factory are as under: (i) Tarkol/Kachra (ii) Moisture (iii) Other deductions. But, the bills for inputs were raised by the supplier of the net quantity of waste paper accepted by the assessee, It appears to Revenue that the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tails of transportation of finished goods of the appellant. On comparison of entries in the log book, it appear to Revenue that only some clearances matched, in large number of instances, no corresponding invoices showing removal of goods was issued by the appellant company. Thus, it appeared that the appellants have clandestinely removed the finished goods, which were excisable without payment of duty. Search was also conducted at the premises of M/s Kalkaji Papers at Kalkaji, Delhi. During sea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an, the transporter of the appellant Company, have assisted in clandestine removal and payment have been made by the said Shri Paras Singhal in cash to the Director, Shri Sameer Garg, of the appellant Company. 5. SCN dated 31.03.2008 was issued proposing to levy duty of ₹ 65,27,331/- on goods removed without payment of duty and ₹ 2,52,924/- was supposed to be demanded on the goods removed to M/s Kalkaji Papers on the basis of packing slips recovered and further penalty was proposed o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- upon the Appellant Company under Section 11AC read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and penalty of ₹ 2.50 lakhs each was imposed on Shri Neeraj Jindal and Shri Sameer Garg, both Directors of the Appellant Company and further penalty of ₹ 75,000/- on Shri Yogesh, Supervisor of the appellant Company, all under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. 7. The ld.Counsel for the appellants, states that the proper opportunity of hearing have not been granted , inasmuch as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dings of the Adjudicating Authority in Order in Original No.01/Commr./Noida/2010-11 as regards the computation of duty, culpability of the co-noticees, amount of Central Excise Duties confirmed and the penalties imposed." Accordingly, he prays for setting aside the impugned order with the direction to the ld.Commissioner to provide an adequate opportunity of hearing including cross-examination of the person, whose statements have been relied upon and also from whose premises, documents reco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is based on evidences collected from third party premises as well as the statement of son of the transporter, Shri Mukul Goel, son of Shri Mohan Lal. Shri Mukul Goel, in his statement, available at Exibit-C, has stated that he assisted his father, Shri Mohan Lal, who is proprietor of concern "Shri Mohan Lal Kalicharan", although the entries in the note book/log book are maintained by the driver of the vehicle, but at times, he also makes entries as per information given by the Driver. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

book including the drivers, who allegedly maintained the log books. The appellant's application for cross examination was rejected by the ld.Commissioner vide communication dated 04.06.2012 stating that Shri Mukul Goel, son of Shri Mohan Lal was present at the time of search and he admitted transportation of the goods from the appellant Company and admitted to maintain the log book by the driver and himself. In view of the non-retraction of his statement till date, the statement holds good. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version