Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh Versus M/s Torque Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Limited

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of expenditure under Section 40(a)(ia) - Held that:- The assessee had made a claim of deduction in the return of income. No finding has been recorded by the authorities below that the claim made by the assessee is malafide. It has been categorically recorded by the Tribunal after examining the entire material on record that the CIT(A) had rightly cancelled the penalty against the assessee. It was further recorded that the assessee made a bonafide claim of ded .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

claim made by the assessee has not been shown to be suffering from any of these conditions. In the absence of any finding recorded by the CIT(A) or the Tribunal with regard to the claim of the assessee that it was malafide, there is no error in cancelling the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. - Decided against revenue - ITA No. 417 of 2015 (O&M) - Dated:- 16-3-2016 - Ajay Kumar Mittal And Raj Rahul Garg, JJ. For the Appellant : Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate ORDER Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. 1. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o has relied upon the decision of ITAT Delhi in AT&T Communication Services India Pvt. Limited (42 DTR 22) and the decision relied upon by the Hon'ble ITAT is adequately countered by the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Zoom Communication (P) Limited (2010) 327 ITR 510? 2. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in the appeal may be noticed. The assessee company filed its return of income on 4.12.2006 declaring nil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iv) Addition on account of capitalization of interest amounting to ₹ 5,82,625/- plus ₹ 2053/- plus ₹ 8302/-. v) Addition under section 40A(3) amounting to ₹ 18,297/-. vi) Addition on account of disallowance under section 80IC on reallocation of expenses amounting to ₹ 28,63,569/-. vii) Addition amounting to ₹ 1,42,520/- on account of interest debited to Dera Bassi unit and treated as relating to Baddi Unit. viii) Addition of ₹ 3,70,836/- on account of c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

order dated 29.3.2012, Annexure A.4. The assessee filed appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. Vide order dated 1.7.2013, Annexure A.5, the CIT(A) cancelled the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. The revenue filed appeal before the Tribunal. Vide order dated 19.5.2015, Annexure A.6, the Tribunal upheld the order passed by the CIT(A). Hence the instant appeal by the revenue. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the revenue. 4. The primary challenge in this appeal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e assessee made a bonafide claim of deduction of the expenditure and even though it was not acceptable to the revenue would not lead to the conclusion that the assessee had concealed the particulars of income or filed inaccurate particulars of income. The relevant findings recorded by the Tribunal read thus:- 8. We have considered the rival submissions and material available on record. The issue involved in the appeal is regarding cancellation of penalty on addition made on account of disallowan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lars of income or has furnished inaccurate particulars of income. The appeal of the assessee on substantial question of law with regard to disallowance under the provision had been admitted by Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court. The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Haryana Warehousing Corporation 314 ITR 215 held as under:- Held. Dismissing the appeal that the deduction claimed by the assessee was legitimate and bonafide in terms of the conflicting determin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version