TMI Blog2004 (12) TMI 688X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of Delhi in Regular Second Appeal No.12 of 1999 dated 12th April, 1999 whereby the High Court dismissed the Second Appeal preferred by the appellant on a finding that there was no substantial question of law involved in the Second Appeal. The Second Appeal arose from a suit filed by landlord-respondent for perpetual and mandatory injunction against the appellants alleging that they had carried ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gh Court of Delhi being Regular Second Appeal No.12 of 1999 which, as earlier noticed, was dismissed by the High Court on a finding that no substantial question of law was involved in the Second Appeal. Thereafter the petitioner preferred a special leave petition and after grant of special leave this appeal has been placed before us for disposal. After hearing the parties and going through the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g the Second Appeal. We, therefore, find no merit in this appeal and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Counsel for the appellants submitted before us that he is willing to obey the decree of the Courts below and comply with the directions contained therein. He submitted that since execution has been laid he is under constant threat and warrant of attachment has been issued. We have no doub ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
