9911796707
TMI Blog2005 (9) TMI 654X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a ORDER Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice President. - After hearing both sides for some time on the application for waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax of ₹ 30,64,976 and penalty of ₹ 33,66,476 (Rs. 3,00,000 under section 76, ₹ 1,000 under section 77, ₹ 500 under section 75A and ₹ 30,64,976 under section 78), we found that it was possible to decide the appeal itself ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was issued to the appellants on the ground that they had received services, which were taxable under the category of "Consulting Engineer". Since they were authorized agent of M/s. KMK as per rule 6, they were liable to pay service tax and penalty. The notice was adjudicated by the Dy. Commissioner who confirmed the demand and also imposed penalties as above. His order was carried in app ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has been followed in Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. CCE 2005 (179) ELT 481 (Tri. - Mum.), we further note that in the case of Navinon Ltd. cited supra, the Tribunal has held that royalty payments in the present case for the use of technology and know-how cannot be equated with any services to be provided by the foreign company to the Indian company. The present case involved the period prior 16-8-2002 and th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
