GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 305 - CESTAT KOLKATA

2016 (8) TMI 305 - CESTAT KOLKATA - TMI - Penalty CHA - shipping bills - red sanders - cast articles of iron-Manhole cover - certain containers were found to contain Red Sanders against a declaration of Cast Articles of Iron-Manhole Cover in the shipping bills Held that: - no where during the investigation it has come out that both the appellants had knowledge that the goods contained in the containers were Red Sanders wood and not the goods actually declared in the Shipping bills. Inability .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Appellant Shri S.K.Naskar AC(AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per Shri H.K.Thakur 1. These Appeals have been filed by the appellants Shri Subhas Bose and Shri S.Santra against Order-in-Original No.KOL/CUS/PORT/7/07 dt.13.06.2007 under which a penalty of ₹ 5.00 lakhs each has been imposed upon the appellants under Sec. 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. Shri Sukhendu Bhattacharya (Advocate & Shri S.K.Mehta (Advocate) appeared respectively for appellant Shri Subhas Bose & Shri S.San .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2015(330)ELT 705(Tri.-Ahmd.)] 4. Shri S.Bhattacharya (Advocate) appearing on behalf of the appellant Shri Subhas Bose argued that his client may not have the authorization from the exporter but that does not establish that the appellant has knowledge of the fraudulent intentions of the exporter and that there is no extra consideration received for doing the work. That acting without authorization may invite taking of action upon the CHA licence under CHA Regulations. Learned Advocate relied upon .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iginal dated 13.06.2007 to argue that penalties have been correctly imposed. Learned AR thus strongly defended the order passed by the lower authority. 6. Heard both sides and perused the case records. The issue involved in these proceedings is whether penalties can be imposed upon the appellants under section 114 of the customs Act, 19672. DRI intercepted certain containers which were found to contain Red Sanders against a declaration of Cast Articles of Iron-Manhole Cover in the shipping bills .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version