Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shanti Education Society Versus The DCIT (TDS) , Jaipur

Tds u/s 194I - failure to deduct tax at source on payment made to RIICO - assessee in default u/s 201(1) - development charges paid by the assessee to Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Limited (RIICO) towards allotment of land on lease of 99 years - Held that:- As decided in case of M/s. Gupta Fabtex (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT (TDS) [2016 (1) TMI 664 - ITAT JAIPUR] lease document has used the "Development charges" and "Economic rent" to be payable by the assessee. As the d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ecided in favour of assessee - Payment to M/s Rajasthan Technical University (RTU) on account of affiliation fee on which TDS was not deducted - appellant has claimed that the income of RTU is exempt under section 10(23C)(iiiab) - Held that:- The CBDT Circular No 4/2002 dated 16.7.2002 has been issued in the context of self-declaration by entities/institutions whose income is exempt under section 10 of the Act. In the said circular, the CBDT has clarified that in case of those funds or autho .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, there is no requirement to deduct tax at source. In light of above, the AO is directed to verify from the concerned AO of RTU as well as independently from RTU whether the income of RTU is exempt under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. If the AO finds the same to be in order, the AO is directed not to treat the assessee in default u/s 201(1) of the Act and thereby not to recover any tax and interest u/s 201(1A) on payments to RTU. - Decided in favour of assessee for statistical purposes. - IT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the action of the ld. AO in treating the assessee as assessee in default u/s 201(1) for the alleged failure to deduct tax at source on payment made to RIICO and thereby confirming the action of charging interest of ₹ 23,70,599/- u/s 201(1A) of the IT Act, 1961. The Action of the ld. CIT (A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the case. Relief may please be granted by quashing the demand of ₹ 23,70,599/- allegedly raised. 2. In the facts and circumstances of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing of total area of 131028.63 sq.meters at Ramchandrapura Industrial Area, Sitapura Exten. Jaipur from RIICO for a total consideration of ₹ 49,34,82,560/-. For acquiring the said land a lease agreement with RIICO was executed dated 26/07/2011 for a lease period of 99 years. The appellant society paid total amount of ₹ 16,60,27,673/- on account of lease rent payment, development charges and interest on development charges etc. As per ld. AO on these payment, TDS was to be deducted u/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t 1961. The demand raised u/s 201(1A) was however determined at ₹ 23,70,599/-. 2.1 LR AR submitted before the Assessing officer that the lease agreement executed with RIICO for a period of 99 years was to acquire the ownership rights in the industrial land. The payment so made was not for merely use of the land but larger interest comprising bundle of rights was acquired and , therefore, it was not rent and was not liable for TDS U/s 194-I. The ld. AO did not agree with the contentions of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he ld. CIT(A) upheld the order of the ld. AO for the following reasons:- (i) The clauses of the lease agreement denote that land was given to the assessee on lease and was not transferred by sale. Although the assessee acquired benefit of enduring nature for 99 years and rightly capitalized the expenditure, yet the payment was in the nature of rent liable to TDS. (ii) RIICO itself was not owner of the said land as the Government had allotted the land to RIICO on leasehold basis for a period of 9 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d. vs. DCIT (TDS), Jaipur in ITA No. 647 & 648/JP/2013 for the assessment year 2011-12 and 2012-13. 2.3 The ld. DR relied on the orders of the authorities below. 2.4 We have heard the rival contentions and perused the materials available on record. It emerges from the record that on similar issue the Coordinate Bench in the case of M/s. Gupta Fabtex (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT (TDS) has decided the issue in favour of the assessee by following observations. Even if the aforesaid decision of ITAT Chenna .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fore in our view development charges can'not be read as rent within the purview of the section 194 I. further lease document has provided the consequences of non-payment of the development charges by the assessee, if the assessee failed to pay the development charges, as mentioned in the agreement, the possession was liable to be taken over by the RIICO, therefore the development charges can not be considered as rent. 2.2 In view of the similar facts and circumstances of the assessee's c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

As per AO, such payment was in the nature of professional fee and that the RTU is formed by way of a State Act and not by way of Central Act and therefore it was not covered u/s 196 of IT Act. The AO also noted that the assessee has failed to produce any evidence which may prove that RTU was exempt from Income tax and that before making such payment the appellant was to obtain necessary document from the deductor in support of the fact that such entity was exempt from Income Tax. On the other h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Y. 2008-09 wherein income is shown as exempt u/s 10(23C)(iiiab). The appellant also filed a copy of report of the office of AG in which at page no.30 at para 9, it is mentioned that RTU is exempt u/s 10(23C)(iiiab). 2.4 The ld CIT(A) has given his findings as under: First of all the issue as to whether on the payments made to RTU, TDS was to be deducted or not is to be decided. It may be noted that the appellant society is a University and for academic reasons affiliated to RTU. Therefore the pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

contractual nature, there was no valid basis for non-deduction of tax in as much as M/s RTU was not covered u/s 196 as also that there was no evidence to prove that RTU was covered u/s 10(23C)(iiiab). However during the appellate proceedings as an additional evidence the appellant filed xerox copy of Income Tax Return for A.Y. 2008-09 as also some finding/observation of AG Audit. In the Xerox copy of Income Tax return for A.Y. 2008-09, M/s RTU has claimed its income as exempt u/s 10(23C)(iiiab). .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

come of M/s RTU being finding of auditors of AG department it may be mentioned that their findings may not be a valid basis for treating the income of M/s RTU to be exempt u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. The important point to be noted is that the payment was made during A.Y. 2012-13 and the document to be relied upon for claim of exempted income of M/s RTU should also be pertaining to that period only. Therefore prima facie when the payment was made to M/s RTU, the appellant was required to dedu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

are not applicable on payment to RTU. Ld AR further drawn reference to CBDT Circular No 4/2002 dated 16.7.2002 to support his contention that the TDS provisions are not applicable as the income of the assessee is exempt under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. 2.5 We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. The CBDT Circular No 4/2002 dated 16.7.2002 has been issued in the context of self-declaration by entities/institutions whose income is exempt under sec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Forum: 3B mistake

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version