GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 544 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

2016 (8) TMI 544 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT - TMI - Validity of impugned order - passed by the Revisionary Authority - officer was of the same rank as is the appellate authority - Held that:- the impugned order was passed by the Joint Secretary to Government of India who was also Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs. For the detailed reason that the order in appeal as well as revisionary order had been passed by the officers of the same rank is not permissible as per law. Hence, the i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sed by the Revisionary Authority, rejecting the revision against the order in appeal dated 12.12.2007, passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Delhi-III. The Commissioner (Appeals) had set aside the order passed by the adjudicating authority on 25.1.2006, who had sanctioned refund to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while placing reliance upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court in CWP No. 24967 of 2015-M/s NVR Forgings v. Union of India and others, decided o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Court in M/s NVR Forgings's case (supra), while considering the same issue, opined as under: 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the revisional power has been exercised by officer of the same and equal rank who had upheld the order of impugned demand and penalty and dismissed the appeal i.e., Commissioner (Appeals). Reliance was placed on judgment of this Court in M/s Prakash Pipes Industries Limited, Mayar, Hisar vs. State of Haryana and another, CWP No.9415 of 1990, decid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

considering identical situation, after examining the relevant case law on the point, it was held that the revision by the officer of the same rank was not permissible. It was recorded as under:- 5.The matter is no longer res integra. This Court in Triputi Udyog Ltd. v. State of Haryana (2010) 37 PHT 521 (P&H) while dealing with the identical issue had held that the revision by officer of the same rank was not permissible. It was recorded as under:- Re. Que.(2): Learned counsel for the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

291 and submits that the question of law may be read accordingly. The question appears to have been wrongly formulated. It has been pointed out that the judgment of Andhra Pradesh High Court in Sri Satya Winery has been accepted by the State of Haryana and instructions dated 12.10.1990 have been issued. Accordingly, the Sales Tax Tribunal has been holding that revision by officer of the same or lower rank was not permissible. By way of instances, he has produced following orders of the Tribunal: .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version