2016 (8) TMI 1018

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ised Representative ORDER Heard both sides. 2.  This is an appeal filed against OIO No 29/COMMR/2008 dt 28.3.2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad III. 3.  The Ld Advocate for the appellant submitted that the Appeals filed by the manufacturer M/s Sampat Aluminium Pvt Ltd. and other  persons had been decided by this Tribunal vide order No A/445-447/WZB/AHD/ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ppellant is too harsh. 4.  The Ld Authorised Representative for the Revenue, on the other hand  submitted that the  Shri B R Shah, authorized signatory  of M/s B R Overseas has categorically admitted the sale of 316.850 MT manufactured and cleared without payment of duty by the manufacturer, hence the  Adjudicating Authority has rightly imposed penalty against the appella .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X