Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Kent Malleables Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India and others

2016 (9) TMI 135 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Validity of impugned order of Revisionary Authority - passed by the officer of the same rank as is the appellate authority - Held that:- the impugned order was passed by the Joint Secretary to Government of India who was also Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs. Thus, the order in appeal as well as revisionary order had been passed by the officers of the same rank which is not permissible as per law. Adverting to the judgments relied upon by the respondents, it may be noticed that the sai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

han Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate for the respondents. ... Rajesh Bindal J. The petitioner has approached this court impugning the order dated 9.9.2011 (Annexure P-8), passed by the Revisionary Authority, rejecting the revision against the order in appeal dated 31.8.2006 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Jalandhar, Headquarter at Chandigarh. The Commissioner (Appeals) had modified the order passed by the adjudicating authority on 6.3.200 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

before the Revisionary Authority. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid legal position. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paper book. This Court in M/s NVR Forgings's case (supra), while considering the same issue, opined as under: 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the revisional power has been exercised by officer of the same and equal rank who had upheld the order of impugned demand and penalty and dismissed the appeal i. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tilal Amratlal Shodhan vs. F.N.Rana and others, AIR 1964 SC 648. 7. In M/s Prakash Pipes Industries Limited's case (supra) to which one of us (Ajay Kumar Mittal,J.) was a member, while considering identical situation, after examining the relevant case law on the point, it was held that the revision by the officer of the same rank was not permissible. It was recorded as under:- 5.The matter is no longer res integra. This Court in Triputi Udyog Ltd. v. State of Haryana (2010) 37 PHT 521 (P& .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

orders passed by officer of the same or higher rank. He relies upon judgment of Andhra Pradesh High Court in Sri Satya Winery & Distillery Private Ltd. v. State of A.P. (2000) 117 STC 291 and submits that the question of law may be read accordingly. The question appears to have been wrongly formulated. It has been pointed out that the judgment of Andhra Pradesh High Court in Sri Satya Winery has been accepted by the State of Haryana and instructions dated 12.10.1990 have been issued. Accordi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version