Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Principal Commissioner of Central Excise Gurgaon-II Versus M/s Ucal Fuel Systems Ltd.

2016 (9) TMI 571 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Extended period of limitation - Valuation - amount of sales tax concession retained by the assessee - assessable value - Held that: - during the relevant period there was CBEC Circular dated 30.06.2000 which provides that any amount of concession on sales tax retained by the respondent is not required to be added in the assessable value and there are certain judicial pronouncements of this Tribunal holding the same view in the case of Life Long India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE [2012 (3) TMI 349 - CESTAT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the order dated 19.08.2015 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short, the Tribunal):- (i) Whether the CESTAT was right in dropping the demand towards duty pertaining to the extended period of limitation? (ii) Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal was justified in dropping the demand towards duty pertaining to the extended period of limitation despite the finding of the adjudicating authority that the Sales tax/VAT amounts collected by the assessee from .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he respondent is required to be added in the assessable value? (iv) Whether any amount of concession on sales tax retained by the respondent is required to be added in the assessable value as per CBEC Circular F.No. 354/81/2000-TRU dated 30.6.2000 or not? (v) Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal was justified in setting aside the consequential penalty imposed upon the respondent when the Tribunal had itself held that the amount of sales tax concession retained by the respondent is required to be add .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in case of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. vs. CCE Delhi,2014(307) ELT 625 (SC) and Super Synotex (India) Ltd. vs. CCE Jaipur, 2014(301) ELT 273, however, on the ground of limitation, the issue was decided in favour of the assessee. Once the assessee was found to be at fault in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court, the extended period of limitation should have been permitted. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant, we do not find any merit in the present appeal. The Trib .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version