2015 (8) TMI 1317

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nsel for the Central Excise Department. 2. In this writ application, the petitioner has sought to challenge the order dated 18-6-2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Regional Bench, Kolkata in Stay Application No. ST/Stay/181/2012 arising out of Appeal No. ST/108/2012-DB directing the petitioner to deposit 25% of Service Tax of Rs. 3.50 crores. 3.&emsp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uch penalty is in dispute, in pursuance of a decision or an order passed by an officer of Central Excise lower in rank than the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise; (ii)     against the decision or order referred to in clause (a) of sub-sec. (1) of Section 35B, unless the appellant has deposited seven and half per cent. of the duty, in c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 14. Explanation - For the purpose of this section "duty demanded" shall include - (i)      amount determined under Section 11D; (ii)     amount of erroneous Cenvat credit taken;". 4. Although the aforesaid provision is not retrospective in operation, yet this Court exercising writ jurisdiction over the matter and looking into the difficultie .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X