9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (9) TMI 923X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ORDER P. C. 1. The petitioner has challenged by this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the orders passed by the respondent No.3 dated 3rd November, 2006, Annexure-A, 6th August, 2005 passed by respondent No.2, Annexure-I as also the order passed by respondent No.1 dated 20th March, 2002, Annexure-F. By the order dated 3rd November, 2006, the Second Appeal was partly allowed by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 9.12.98 to 31.1.99, till the decisions of Honourable Bombay High Court writ petition N.92 of 1999. Balance amount is recoverable as per provisions of Law." 2. On such a petition and during its pendency this Court after hearing both sides, passed an order on 15th October, 2010 which reads as under : " Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the Revenue. 2. D ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... om the date of receipt of the copy of this Order. 5. It is made clear that pendency of this Petition shall not come in the way of deciding the said application. 6. S.O. after vacation." 3. The petitioners have, therefore, pursued their application dated 15th May, 2006, made to the Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax, Pune. On that application, an order has been passed and now the petitioner ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... egistration of the petitioner is validated from 1st April, 1998. Exhibit-1 to this additional affidavit tendered today by the Joint Commissioner is he requisite order of 24th March, 2011. 5. In view thereof, we do not think that the writ petition should be kept pending. The legal questions and issues are kept open for decision in an appropriate case. We dispose of the Writ Petition with a directi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
